Is Walmart Open On Thanksgiving? Here Is A List Of What’s Open

by

23 November 2023

News

Is Walmart Open On Thanksgiving

Prepare for Thanksgiving with this quick guide on what’s open and closed this holiday. Whether you’re in need of last-minute groceries, planning to grab a quick bite, or thinking about some holiday shopping, here’s what you need to know.

Some major players like Costco and Target are taking a break on Thursday, but fear not – options abound. Kroger and Big Lots keep their doors open, although some have reduced hours. According to industry experts, this shift reflects changing consumer habits and a nod to employee well-being.

Walmart is giving its associates a break, with all stores closed on Thanksgiving. Similarly, Target and Ross are following suit, keeping their doors shut this year on the holiday.

Costco and Sam’s Club won’t be luring shoppers in on Thanksgiving either. Meanwhile, Home Depot and Lowe’s are also taking a pause.

Ace Hardware stores, being independently owned, have varying hours, but many will join the Thanksgiving closure trend, according to the company.

Most CVS stores keep regular hours for those needing some pharmacy items, and the same is true for Walmart Pharmacy. But it’s wise to check for local variations. For the first time in its history, Walgreens is closing most locations on Thanksgiving, with 24-hour stores being the exception.

Remember, the U.S. Postal Service won’t deliver mail on Thursday, but fear not – normal operations resume on Friday. UPS and FedEx stores are also closed on Thanksgiving, and no packages will arrive to you on Thursday. Operations return to normal on Friday for both.

If you’re in banking mode, major banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Capital One, Citibank, PNC, and Truist are closing their branches on Thanksgiving. However, Friday sees them back in business as usual.

Stay informed by checking your local store or restaurant online before heading out – hours and closures can vary. Thanksgiving is a time to give thanks, and knowing what’s open and closed makes planning your day a breeze. Enjoy your Thanksgiving!

Read More About:

Ankita Tripathy loves to write about food and the Hallyu Wave in particular. During her free time, she enjoys looking at the sky or reading books while sipping a cup of hot coffee. Her favourite niches are food, music, lifestyle, travel, and Korean Pop music and drama.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Instagram Head Adam Mosseri Says “Threads Is Not Going To Amplify News”

Instagram Head Adam Mosseri Says, “Threads Is Not Going To Amplify News”  

New Instagram app ‘threads’ are not prepared to challenge Elon Musk’s X if statements made by Adam Mosseri recently hold. Instagram head Adam further stated that the company didn’t intend to ‘amplify’ news on this platform. Users can also delete the Instagram account if they don't prefer the "Threads" concept. Although his position is not that unsure, it is discourteous if someone is looking to exit X in favor of benefits. https://twitter.com/safespace4space/status/1712165140127179201?s=20 As per Meta’s information, social media platforms, like Facebook and Instagram, have had difficult relationships with news publishers over a few years. They have even had fights regarding publishing fake news, accusations, and clickbait of multiple political biases.   Meta-owned ‘X’ social media platform has the potential to pull X users who are unsatisfied with Musk’s changes. At an Instagram creator event held last week, Mosseri expressed his statement, “We want to empower creators in general. We try not to slant too hard into the news. We’re not anti-news.” https://twitter.com/ians_india/status/1712348108120604902?s=20 While it is reasonable to say that Threads might be too new to have this solid approach to handling modern news. The requirement for X alternatives has become more popular in increasing the number of misinformation. Regarding additions, Mosseri is incorrect that Threads is not getting any news. Recently, the company has deleted many news-related search terms, such as ‘covid,’' the Washington Post,’ and so many others. Keep Reading: YouTube Ends Premium Lite Plans After 2 Year Trial Period! Get Your Deets AI Coaching Comes To LinkedIn Learning: AI-Powered Innovations To Revolutionize

READ MOREDetails
YouTube Ends Premium Lite Plans After 2 Year Trial Period

YouTube Ends Premium Lite Plans After 2 Year Trial Period! Get Your Deets

In a recent development, YouTube has decided to discontinue its Premium Lite subscription plan, which had been on a two-year trial run. Subscribers to this lower-cost ad-free video viewing option will no longer have access to it after October 25th, 2023. Launched at €6.99 per month back in 2021, YouTube's Premium Lite was initially available in select European countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. The plan offered an ad-free viewing experience across all of YouTube's apps and formats. However, it did not include additional Premium features such as offline downloads, background playback, or access to YouTube Music. For existing Premium Lite subscribers, this discontinuation leaves them with two choices: return to watching YouTube with ads or upgrade to the pricier YouTube Premium, which includes YouTube Music. YouTube is offering Lite subscribers a one-month free trial of YouTube Premium, even if they've had a trial before. https://twitter.com/LillianN86366/status/1710453574411653354 To take advantage of this offer, subscribers will need to either cancel their Lite subscription or wait for it to be canceled automatically. It's worth noting that YouTube had previously increased the prices of its Premium and Music subscriptions in the United States earlier this year. Which is why a number of people canceled their YouTube premium membership. In an email to its users, YouTube stated, "We’re writing to let you know that after 25 October 2023, we will no longer be offering your version of Premium Lite. While we understand that this may be disappointing news, we continue to work on different versions of Premium Lite as we incorporate feedback from our users, creators, and partners." The discontinuation of Premium Lite has prompted disappointment among subscribers. Premium Lite might not have been widely known outside the select European regions where it was available, but for those who appreciated ad-free viewing without the added features of YouTube Premium, it filled a niche that's now left wanting.YouTube's decision to end Premium Lite leaves subscribers with important decisions to make regarding their viewing experience, and the move has sparked conversations about the evolving landscape of YouTube subscriptions. Keep Reading About: AI Coaching Comes To LinkedIn Learning: AI-Powered Innovations To Revolutionize News For Investors!! Pinterest’s Exciting Partnership With Amazon Is A Game-Changer For Shareholders!

READ MOREDetails
Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing

Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing Feature Misrepresentation

In a recent development, tech giant Apple has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million to settle a 2019 class-action lawsuit, accusing the company of misrepresenting its Family Sharing feature. Despite Apple denying any wrongdoing, the settlement addresses allegations that the company falsely portrayed the capability to share app subscriptions within family groups. Apple’s settlement case is making headlines following Facebook. The lawsuit contended that a significant portion of subscription-based apps, a growing segment on the Apple platform, couldn't be shared among designated family members, contrary to the representation made by Apple. Court documents revealed that these apps were exclusively available to individual users who downloaded and subscribed to them. The court documents emphasized, "The vast majority of subscription-based apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members." This revelation challenges Apple's previous assertion and sheds light on a potentially misleading practice. Furthermore, the documents highlighted that despite the awareness that subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, Apple continued advertising these apps' features. This advertising strategy may have led millions of consumers to download subscription-based apps, assuming they were shareable within family groups, only to discover otherwise after making payments. While settling the lawsuit, Apple maintains its denial of misrepresentation or wrongdoing. The $25 million settlement resolves the class-action suit, concluding the legal dispute over the Family Sharing feature. This development raises questions about the transparency of subscription-based apps on Apple's platform and the need for clearer communication between the tech giant and its users. As the landscape of app usage evolves, consumers may become more vigilant about the representations made by tech companies, ensuring that advertised features align with actual functionalities. This settlement serves as a reminder for consumers and tech companies to maintain transparency and accuracy in representing features and functionalities, fostering trust in the dynamic world of digital platforms. Read Also: Time Magazine Names Taylor Swift The 2023 Person Of The Year This Is Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording Selena Gomez Gets A Kiss From Bestie Taylor Swift In Latest Birthday Instagram Post

READ MOREDetails