How The Real Estate Industry Has Changed In California Since 2008

Published on: 19 July 2022 Last Updated on: 06 December 2023
Real Estate Industry

The real estate industry in California has seen a lot of change over the past decade. This article will take a closer look at events that played a role in these changes and how they have affected homeowners and businesses in California.

The Housing Market Crash Of 2008

Housing Market Crash

The housing market crash of 2008 was a significant event that affected the real estate industry in California and throughout the United States. This crash was caused by several factors, including the bursting of the housing bubble, the subprime mortgage crisis, and the liquidity crisis.

As a result of this crash, many homeowners lost their homes, businesses went bankrupt, and the unemployment rate increased.

Civil Engineer and President of CES4, Pedram Zohrevand, believes the industry underwent many changes in the years following the crash.

Stricter Lending Standards

After the housing bubble burst, lending standards became much stricter. Because of hundreds of thousands of foreclosures that were taking place in California and around the country, banks were no longer willing to lend money to people who were at risk of defaulting on their mortgages.

As a result, it became much harder for people to buy homes, and the number of home sales in California decreased significantly. After 2009, home sales in California decreased by nearly 60%, according to data from the California Association of Realtors.

The Rise Of Online Real Estate Listings

Online Real Estate Listings

One of the most noteworthy changes in the real estate industry over the past decade has been the rise of online real estate listings, Pedram Zohrevand suggests, having a major impact on homeowners and businesses.

Online listings have made it much easier for homeowners to find information about homes for sale. They can search for properties in their area, compare prices, and view photos and videos of homes without having to visit a real estate office. Buying or selling a home became much easier and more convenient.

Because of this, the number of realtors in California has decreased significantly. The National Association of Realtors shows that between 2006 and 1016, the number of California realtors dropped from over 100,000 to under 60,000.

For businesses, online real estate listings have created a new way to reach potential customers. Real estate businesses can now advertise their properties online and attract a much wider audience. Zillow stated that in 2017, they had more than 160 million unique visitors to their site.

Zohrevand believes this has increased competition among real estate businesses, as they all fight for a share of the online market.

More Foreign Buyers In The Market

A foreign buyer is not a citizen or permanent resident of the United States. They can be a person or a company and buy property anywhere in the country. In California, most foreign buyers come from China, Canada, and Mexico.

Foreign buyers have played a substantial role in the real estate market in California over the past decade. They are often willing to pay cash for properties, which helps to drive up prices. In addition, they are usually looking for luxury homes, which further increases market costs.

According to the National Association of Realtors, foreign buyers accounted for $77 billion of all residential sales in the United States in 2016. Of that, $28 billion was in California: representing a 35% increase from 2015. It was the highest amount ever recorded.

Read more: Buy Before You Sell Program

Californians Moving To Other States

real estate industry revolution

In recent years, a large exodus of Californians has moved to other states. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows more than 100,000 Californians moved to another state in 2016. This was the highest number of moves out of California recorded in a decade.

But why are they moving? Pedram Zohrevand believes there are several reasons. The high cost of living in California is one factor. Many people struggle to afford a place to live with the high cost of living and taxes.

In addition, many businesses are leaving because of the complicated regulatory environment. True to form, prices have begun to decline with the decrease in housing demand, leading to an increase in foreclosures and short sales.

Increased Regulation From State And Local Governments

Regulation from state and local governments has made it much harder for individuals to buy or sell a property in California. For example, the Homeowners Bill of Rights, passed in 2012, put additional restrictions on lenders and made it harder for them to foreclose on a property. As a result, many lenders have stopped lending money to people in California.

In addition, there are now a number of disclosure forms that must be filled out when buying or selling a property. These forms are designed to protect buyers and sellers but can also be confusing and time-consuming.

The Economic Recession

Economic Recession

While the recession technically ended in 2009, many people still feel its effects. The unemployment rate in California is higher than the national average, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In addition, the state has many people who are underemployed or working part-time jobs.

Final Thoughts

While the real estate industry has undergone many changes in the last decade, California remains one of the most desirable places to live. The state has a lot to offer, and people are still willing to pay a premium to live here.

However, it is important to be aware of the challenges that the industry faces and to be prepared for further changes in the future. If you’re considering buying or selling a home in California, work with an experienced real estate agent who can help you navigate the market. Where do you think is the best place to live in California?

Read Also:

Arnab is a professional blogger, having an enormous interest in writing blogs and other jones of calligraphies. In terms of his professional commitments, He carries out sharing sentient blogs.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Why do modern people prefer Coliving to other housing options?

We have often been told that more of us will live in cities and that cities will be bigger. But what we have not seen is how this will happen. While there is a growing awareness among the public, politicians, developers, and architects about the need to improve living conditions in cities, little is being done. Coliving is still a new concept, but the fast-growing Coliving industry aims to redefine the way we live. Coliving offers shared living spaces, sharing kitchen facilities, sharing laundry, and cleaning services. The potential cost savings are significant, although the initial start-up costs are high. Living in smaller spaces is a cultural norm in the affluent West. But until recently, people in most developing countries had few options beyond informal settlements or slums. Now, thanks to urbanization, millions of people are leaving rural areas and moving into cities. Urbanization is speeding up in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, but the trend has been visible in developed countries, too. In 1960, 70 percent of the world lived in cities; by 2050, it will be 75 percent. Read this blog content about coliving from History of coliving In the 1950s, we began to think of space as a commodity. At first, we thought of it as a commodity to be bought and sold, like a plot of land or a building. Then, we came to think of it as a utility, like electricity or water. Then, as the idea of sustainability grew, people began to think of space as a vital resource. Finally, in the 21st century, we came to think of space as a service. That is, a space is a service, like a utility, that provides shelter, privacy, and community. Co-living also falls under a relatively new concept of Housing as a service. It is disrupting the way we screen, monitor, and select housing. Co-living is seen as a promising potential from industry experts from different market leaders as the real estate developers, hospitality companies, and investment community. Big names in the retail- and automotive industry are adding co-living to their portfolios. Related Reads: Smaller Apartment Downsizing Hacks Coliving benefits SharedEasy launches its new spaces which is an innovation lab based in New York. Here are some main benefits of coliving: Co-living spaces are breaking free of traditional housing models. They provide living spaces with shared amenities, such as gyms, cafeterias, and common areas. Co-living spaces are often in buildings with 100 to 400 rooms. Co-living is not a new trend, but a new business model, with unprecedented demand. Co-living spaces offer more than just a place to sleep. They provide shared amenities like gyms and cafeterias. Co-living spaces are viewed as an alternative to conventional housing, either because of cost or lifestyle issues. Co-living spaces are growing in popularity. An increasing number of millennials are choosing these spaces over conventional homes. Urbanization brings with it many benefits. But rapid urbanization also brings with it many new problems. Often, people are priced out of the housing market. They are forced to live in informal settlements or slums. They lack adequate access to infrastructures such as water and sanitation. And because of the strain on city infrastructure, cities are left vulnerable during natural disasters. “Build it and they will come” is a noble sentiment. But it doesn’t work in practice. Related Reads: Property Investment Worths Coliving in practice Housing is a basic human right. For most of us, our housing is the biggest single expense we have every month. But building housing is expensive. Many cities are at or very near their historic peak population levels. The East Coast already has more housing than it can reasonably absorb, with the result being that half the population cannot reasonably afford a home. And California, which has experienced a spectacular population boom in recent decades, has a serious housing shortage. Insufficient housing is one reason why young people, especially, are leaving cities for the suburbs. By some estimates, 30% of young people between the ages of 18 and 34 live with their parents, compared to 7% of older people. Co-living is a response to this problem. It’s a way of living that takes advantage of the economies of scale in housing. Instead of people having to buy or rent their own house, they live together. In a normal house, people generally have private rooms, but in co-living arrangements, they share a bathroom and a kitchen. Co-living has many advantages. Now people can live near their best neighbors, and they can also share costs. And they do not have to be locked into a long-term contract with a landlord. But it also has some disadvantages. First, co-living is not for everybody. Some people want privacy. For these people, co-living is probably not a good idea. Second, the co-living companies need to manage a large number of people, and this requires a lot of staff. This is a considerable expense. But most importantly, co-living does not solve the fundamental problem. We need to build a lot more housing. Why is coliving preferred by millennials? Co-living, in this sense, is an evolution of what millennials have come to think of as normal: a communal living arrangement that mirrors the way social media functions. It’s both social and intimate, it’s both private and communal. And it’s a community where members do not compete with one another for space; instead, they collaborate, sharing common spaces and amenities, from kitchens and living rooms to bedrooms and bathrooms. Conclusion Co-living in particular is the logical consequence of sharing everything online. The idea of shared living spaces has been around for quite a while. The Victorian fascination with communal living and with communal service — the belief that community was the key to happiness — was reflected in the rise of the boarding house and the shared house. Read Also: Federal Government and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis They Created How Much Will You Pay To See Landmarks During Lockdown?

Apartment Home

Apartment Home Hunting Like a Pro

A house is not a home, and neither is an apartment home is where the heart is. If your heart is everywhere, then the very outdoors could be your home—but that’s not the case for most people. The point is, even if you’re just going to rent a place for a little bit, you want somewhere you can rest your heart comfortably. Now what makes you comfortable at your core is necessarily going to differ from that which makes someone else comfortable. Everyone has their own deal makers and their own deal-breakers. Following, we’ll examine a few features of apartment home-hunting that, for the most part, are generally agreed to be relevant. Before we get into them, keep in mind: to get a good idea of what’s available, it’s fundamentally essential that you examine multiple units. Try to look at five, minimum, before deciding. If you can see twenty units and closely examine them all, that’s ideal; but for most, five will be a good minimum spread. That said, consider the following tactics. Techniques To Follow For Apartment Home Hunting Set A Price Range, Consider Travel, Know Leases How much are you willing to spend? This number can’t be static, it’s got to have a range. You can get a better apartment home for less if you’re willing to rent from landlords on the outskirts of the city where you work. However, what you pay in wear-and-tear for your vehicle and gasoline may actually end up being more expensive over the long term. If you found an apartment right on top of where you work in Dallas, Texas, and one on the outskirts of town for half the price, it could be that the centrally-located unit saves you money. The commute in and out of the city center will be an hour, minimum; meaning two hours a day. If you work five hours a week, that’s 520 lost hours a year (assuming you work 52 weeks). If your time is worth $10, that’s $5,200 you’re losing. If your time is worth $100 an hour, then that’s $52,000 you lose in time alone. There’s an opportunity cost to a commute, depending on how productive you are when you aren’t working. That doesn’t take into account gas or wear-and-tear, either. At .58 cents a mile, and 40 miles’ round-trip commute five days a week, that’s $6,032. A long commute can collaterally cost you as much as $11,232 a year. That’s $936 a month. If you’ve got an apartment home right on top of where you work, and you can walk, that’s preferable to the commute even considering the increased cost. The difficulty is how long you’re locked into a lease, and how long you’ll be working where you are. Top-Tier Units Have Collateral Advantages It might be worthwhile to check out some of these good looking apartments in Galleria, Dallas. Sites such as that in the link provide you a broad spread of communities that have varying advantages and benefits. You want the broadest spread of potential units to choose from in order to make the best choice. Additionally, those units should be relatively qualitative. While “home is what you make it” may have some validity, it’s a lot easier to get comfortable in new apartment home where all the appliances work and you can trust your neighbors. Certainly, you can make a home of rent-controlled units or low-income housing options, but that’s going to get iffy real quick; especially when your recovering addict neighbor knocks on your door at two in the morning to borrow rice or toilet paper or something. General Quality Of Units Apartments are generally rentals, so you may not need to find something that has any resale value down the line. You’re looking for a right-now solution. Renting doesn’t build equity. Buying does. If you’re buying a condo or an apartment, that’s a different story. The quality of the unit you inhabit will depend on your overall purpose in purchasing it. Making The Best Choice Know your price range, what kind of travel you’ll have to deal with, how much money you’ll be making every month, how long you plan on staying in the apartment, and what sort of quality you can handle. Once you know these things, look at a minimum of five units which fit such qualifications, and do some. Read Also: Buying A House Vs Renting An Apartment: Which Is More Affordable? Brunswick Apartments For Sale: 4 Inspection Tips For Buyers Preparing To Stay In A Luxury Apartment On A Vacation

Buy to let mortgage

Buy to Let Mortgage Explained

A buy to let mortgage differs from a regular mortgage since it is for investors or landlords who buy property to rent out to tenants; not for their residential purposes.  The essential differences that an investor should be aware of can be provided through professional and experienced advice from mortgage brokers in the UK. Some issues linked to the subject are listed below: Buy to Let mortgage in the UK is available to individuals as well as to corporates and companies. However, a BTL mortgage for a company will have to be through a lender who accepts investment through limited companies. Maximum limit:  The amount that can be borrowed is linked to the expected rental income.  Lenders usually require the rental income to be 25-30% higher than the mortgage payment. Deposit: A deposit will be required to be paid to the lender; it is usually 25% of the value of the property (though this can escalate to about 40%). Repayments:  The two ways of paying back the mortgage are explained below: Interest-only mortgage: is self-explanatory and, every month, only the interest on the loan is paid back. This means lower monthly payments, but the loan will have to be paid at the end of the mortgage period. Repayment mortgage: is when both the interest as well as some portion of the loan itself are paid back.  A higher monthly payment will be required, but the advantage is that by the time the mortgage term matures, in all probability, the entire loan would be repaid. Depending on the investor’s capital and budget, advice will be required on the Repayment issue since lenders vary on the repayment requirements. Taxes:  Both Capital Gains Tax and Income Tax are payable on buy to let properties. Capital Gains Tax: The rate is payable dependent on the income bracket of the investor. By adjusting property purchase fees (or even losses from another BTL property), this tax can be reduced. Income Tax: Landlords will not be able to deduct the mortgage interest from rental income.  Instead, the total mortgage interest payment will receive a 20% tax relief.  Fees like council tax or property maintenance charges can be offset if the annual income allowable is exceeded. BTL remortgage: By switching to another deal once the current mortgage is over, a BTL remortgage can sometimes be advantageous as the interest rate can be lower. If a remortgage is required earlier, lenders usually require a minimum time of 6 months after the title deeds are transferred before they will consider this.  However, arrangement fees for BTL are high so remortgaging can be expensive and, since interest rates can fluctuate, the pros and cons will need to be carefully reviewed. Regulation of Buy to let mortgage:  Most of these mortgages are not regulated by the FCA as they are treated as business borrowing. However, Consumer BTL mortgages are handled in the same way as residential mortgages by the FCA, protecting the investor from fraud or incorrect advice.  This type of mortgage is for “accidental landlords” - it is defined as ‘a buy-to-let mortgage contract which is not entered into by the borrower wholly or predominantly for the purposes of a business carried on, or intended to be carried on, by the borrower.’  For example, if the property is bought for relatives to live in, it would be considered as a Consumer BTL mortgage. Legislation:  Investors need a tenancy agreement, outlining the terms and responsibilities of both parties.   The rented property should be kept safe with a fire alarm and all gas and electrical equipment maintained in good condition.  An energy performance certificate should be provided to the tenant.  The tenant’s right to rent should be checked.  The deposit should be protected in a Government-backed scheme. Conclusion:  As in every critical decision, the pros and cons need to be weighed.  In the case of a Buy to Let mortgage, some of them are: Advantages: Demand: With the demand exceeding supply, the rental market is suitable for investors. Capital gain: Although there is a risk with the value of property fluctuating, “brick-and-mortar” has usually survived and increased in value. Income: With the rental trend increasing, the revenue should be an asset. Disadvantages: High fees: Fees, deposits, and admin/legal costs can be increased. Rental voids: There is the risk of having no tenant or a tenant who is problematic with payments. Legal: Keeping in line with the legal requirements can be a big responsibility. Should a BTL mortgage be decided on, just keep in mind that the stamp duty holiday is till 31 March 2021 and so all necessary documentation should be completed well in time if this benefit is to be availed! Read Also: Federal Government and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis They Created 7 Expert Tips In Finding The Best Mortgage Broker In Vancouver Finding the Best Mortgage Lenders to Buy Your Dream House