How Long Does it Take to Get a Divorce in the UK?

Published on: 01 February 2019 Last Updated on: 08 August 2019
Divorce

This is a question that most people in the initial stages of the divorce process will ask. The best answer is; it depends on your particular situation. But in this post, we will take a look at how long the process should take and what you can do to speed it up brought to you by Goodman Ray.

The Myths vs. Reality:

58% of people polled think that it takes years to complete a divorce. But this is normally far from the truth. It is realistically possible to complete the process in as little as four to six months. Uncontested divorces, in particular, don’t take too long to complete since it is often only a matter of filing the paperwork correctly.

It is, however, important to note that while the process of ending a marriage can be completed quickly, other processes can take longer. This is true if the couple struggles to resolve matters like finances and matters pertaining to their children.

Divorce

Dedicated Divorce Centers:

In the past, divorce petitions were filed at the local county courts and checked by district judges, which was time-consuming. To streamline the process and allocate resources more effectively, this system was recently replaced. Now there are 11 dedicated regional divorce centers whose main task is to process these legal separations. Therefore, if the toy is petitioning for a divorce, you ate required to send your documents to the nearest divorce center. Here, the documents will be processed by legal advisers instead of judges.

This new system is aimed at speeding up the first two stages of the divorce process. It is, however, worth noting that you’ll still have to wait 6 weeks and a day to get the decree nisi.

How to Speed Up the Divorce Process:

Despite the fact that the time it takes to get a divorce can vary, there are several things you can do to speed up the process. The following are just some of the best;

  • If possible, try to get an agreement from your spouse on the reason for filing the divorce petition. If they don’t agree and decide to contest the divorce, the process could take longer than you want.
  • It is also very important to make sure that you file the paperwork on time. This is true for both the respondent and the petitioner. This helps to minimize the wasted time that could add unnecessary time to the process.
  • Also, ensure that you don’t make any mistakes when filling the paperwork. Mistakes can also cause significant delays of anything from 6 t0 8 weeks. This is because you may have to redo the paperwork. It is advisable to get legal help when completing the form to ensure there are minimal errors.

Getting Started:

The biggest delay in the divorce process often comes at the very beginning of the process, even before either party has filed the petition. This is because most couples, about 76% try to solve the problems in the marriage rather than seek a legal separation. The average couple will spend up to 18 months trying to keep their marriage from breaking down.

Getting a divorce is no doubt one of the biggest decisions you’ll have to make and it does require bravery. A survey found that 11% of people will hold back from getting divorced because of the stigma around it. The average person may take up to 2 years thinking about getting a divorce rather than just taking the first step.

Finances and Arrangements for the Children:

Even after you have your decree absolute, the divorce process itself may not be over. Certain matters including finances and arrangements for the children can complicate the process. Choosing to go to court to resolve these issues can cost you a lot of time and money. It is often a good idea to seek other means of resolving them such as mediation and collaborative law. A prenuptial or a postnuptial agreement can also help.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Worker's Compensation Lawyer

Pros & Cons Of Hiring A Worker’s Compensation Lawyer

As you are reading this article, we can assume that you or any of your close ones have encountered an injury at the workplace. If you encounter any accident and get any injury at work, you become eligible for worker's compensation. This program is particularly designed for offering you financial support during the time when you are unable to work and also creating income. When you are filing worker’s compensation benefits, you might be going through a dilemma about whether you should hire a worker’s compensation lawyer or not. Here we must say that both of them have their own benefits and disadvantages. Here, in this article, we will talk about both the pros and cons of hiring a worker’s compensation lawyer for your worker’s compensation case. Pros Of Hiring A Worker’s Compensation Lawyer: In case you are thinking about hiring a worker’s compensation lawyer from the best Law Offices of William F. Underwood, III, P.C., You will be able to get the following benefits. 1. Puts An End To Your case In some cases, the worker’s compensation dispute might take several months or even years. This long duration will always invite more financial problems when you are already losing your wage and carrying a treatment cost. An experienced worker compensation lawyer will be able to handle things with their expertise, and the matter will get resolved efficiently. 2. Shortens The Wait We all are a little aware of the court system and also know how much time it consumes to resolve a matter if we follow the same traditional way without any legal agent or lawyer. As we have mentioned earlier, it will take a long time, especially in case your injury is more serious and you need a huge amount, as your employer’s insurance company will always want to delay the matter. Here, having a lawyer will ensure that you are getting fair compensation as soon as possible. 3. Allows A Lump Sum Payment Often judges feel hesitant when it comes to awarding a lump-sum amount of compensation at the trial. As per that, you might be limited to weekly or monthly payments for a period of a number of months or years. In case you are carrying any major medical treatment, it becomes really difficult to pay for it. On the other hand, when you hire a lawyer, the professional will be able to manage a settlement and get you a considerably huge amount. 4. Eliminates The Risk When you are thinking about an out-of-court settlement, it is really difficult to reach a settlement because both parties do not want to come to an agreement by making smaller compromises. In this case, a lawyer will be able to bring both parties together at a common ground and that too out of court. Because when you are appealing to the court, there will always be a risk that you might come out empty-handed. 5. A Better Negotiation During the settlement proceedings, an attorney can perform the negotiation on your behalf. The insurance company already has an attorney; when you are also hiring a legal professional, your worker’s compensation lawyer will be on equal footing with the other party. When the insurance company gets to know that you have a legal professional to represent you, they will be more willing to respect your rights. Cons Of Hiring A Worker’s Compensation Lawyer Now you know the advantages of hiring a worker’s compensation lawyer. But when you are thinking of hiring one, you also should know the drawbacks that you might be inviting in order to get the good things. So, here are the major disadvantages of hiring an attorney for your worker’s compensation claim. 1. Can Cause Give Up Your Right When you are thinking of hiring a lawyer and getting the amount that you have claimed and willing to take the matter to court, the insurance company does not agree to pay you that. In this case, ending the case with an out-of-court settlement means you are giving up on some particular benefits. There are a lot of insurance companies that come with a clause that when you are receiving a claimed compensation, you will not get worker’s compensation for the same injury. 2. Could Be Really Expensive. Hiring a lawyer means you need to pay them. In order to ensure winning your worker’s compensation claim lawsuit, you must opt for the best one or at least a good one. And good lawyers always charge more. Due to your injury, you are already paying a huge medical bill and also not getting paid enough as you are unable to work for a few days. In this situation affording a lawyer can cost you a lot of your savings, and you might run out of money. FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) When you are going to deal with worker's compensation, it is obvious that you will have a lot of queries and doubts. In order to handle a legal matter, you also need to know the basic and adequate knowledge of the laws. So, here are some questions you might have in your head, along with their answers. Q1: What Are The Disadvantages Of Worker's Compensation? A serious disadvantage of worker’s compensation is that it might discourage the employees from pursuing further employment. Many individuals might feel that to continue getting worker’s compensation payment, they must obtain from working some specific jobs to prove the severity and seriousness of their injuries. To learn more, visit Employment law firm in Miami. Q2: What Are The Pros And Cons Of Worker's Compensation? The pros of Worker’s compensation are; No more litigation. The opportunity to revisit the settlement terms. In exchange for future benefits, recompense. Now let’s look at its cons of it. You might end up with less than you actually deserve. In the future reopening, a case might lead to a lower award. Q3: What Is The Highest Workmans Comp Settlement? Till now, the largest worker’s compensation settlement payment is a $10 million settlement agreement. The case came in March of 2017. Read Also: Injured At Work? Claim Your Compensation! Can an Employee Claim for a Personal Injury When Working From Home?

READ MOREDetails
Bail Bonds

Bail Bonds: What You Should Know

Paying bail bonds are not as simple as it seems. Knowing and having the right understanding of how these work, how it is determined, what the payment methods are, and other important issues are very important for anybody who is facing an arrest or who has an arrested loved one. There are several questions asked online to shed light and find out what bail bonds are all about which you may also have, click here to find out the answers. What is Bail? It is a term to describe the release of a person arrested for a criminal offense before the end of the criminal case. It can involve - but not every time - the defendant paying money to a court; this is not a punishment. It ensures the court that the defendant returns to the court now and then while the case is ongoing. It ensures the court that the defendant does not fail to go to court without having to keep him in custody all the time. Bails are significant in both ends – the arrested and the authorities. It ensures that people, no matter if they have a case at court, are free and, also, it avoids having to jam-pack jails with offenders, while have not been convicted yet. With it, offenders can be released almost in any stage of the criminal justice process, either immediately after arrest or while the case is ongoing and the court has not issued a sentence yet. This means that if someone gets arrested, three possible scenarios can come to place: he is arrested and released without charge; he is arrested, charged, and released on bail; or he is arrested, charged and is held in custody until the verdict of the case comes out. Schedule of Bails This is a list of the amount of money applied to individual crimes and can be paid in terms of bails. State laws determine the amount appropriated for a crime, and they decide whether the arrested individual be released without posting any bond at all or if the individual is allowed to post any or not; or if allowed to post bail, should it be posted (and individual is released with it) after booking or should they wait for a hearing. If the state laws allow for immediate release after the appropriate amount is paid, the defendant can post this immediately and release will follow. But if the state law requires a hearing, the defendant will not be able to pay immediately after booking and be released, instead, he will have to wait for the hearing to ensure before anything else. Hearings During a hearing, the court would determine the amount applicably. However, courts do not always allow this; they can also deny it according to applicable state laws. If allowed, the amount will be determined using the following factors as a basis: Flight Risk Level: Sometimes defendants would escape the system especially when they are facing possible major sentences such as death or life imprisonment. These defendants are most likely to flee and escape the penalties. Degree of Connections to the Community: An individual who has a strong connection to the community where he belongs would be less likely to flee. For example, a defendant who has a business in his locality or whose entire family is in that locality, he will have a lesser likelihood of fleeing compared to individuals who have nothing to lose in that locality. Obligations in the Family: Sometimes the court will consider and require lesser bail to defendants who are responsible for the well-being of his family or who have other dependents. Assets and Incomes: When a defendant has a lot of money and/or assets, he may likely not be considered for a low amount. If the defendant is employed, the court may consider that the defendant may likely lose the employment. Court and Criminal Histories of Defendants: Especially individuals who have had histories involving failures to appear in court will most likely have to face higher bonds compared to those who are first-timers in court. Also, the court would look into the number of times a person may have been granted bail and have violated conditions related to the given considerations or who have failed to appear in court. The court will most likely impose higher bond amounts to these individuals as compared to someone without such history. The gravity of the Crime: More serious crimes require higher bonds and lesser serious crimes require lower bond amounts. Public Safety: If the release of an accused individual would pose a risk to the safety of others and/or the community, the courts would most likely refuse to allow bail. Examples for these are cases of treason, rebellion, terrorism, or conspiracy - a defendant charged with these crimes would most likely not be allowed to post bail. The Types of Bail Bonds Most of the time bail bonds are associated with money. The notion is that when one is arrested and he has the money, he can get out of jail immediately. However, it is more complicated than that. There are several questions asked online to shed light and know what bail bonds are all about which you may also have. Different states may have different types of bails, some may apply to another and in others, it may not. The different types may include cash bonds, signature bonds, property bonds, surety bonds, and others. Read Also: Under What Circumstances Can You Bring a Claim Against an Employer? Do I Need a Lawyer for a Car Accident that wasn't My Fault?

READ MOREDetails
food critic

When Restaurants Fight Back: A Diner’s Failed Attempt to Sue a Food Critic for Defamation

Restaurant reviews can make or break your business. A positive review of your restaurant can keep your cash counter busy and tables filled with loud and happy customers. But, a negative review does the complete opposite, leaving hardly any cash to collect and fewer tables to clean.  Food critics hold power, and restaurants know it. Some establishments accept criticism and learn from it. Others take a more aggressive approach that can backfire badly. This is what happened to a well-known diner when they decided to fight back against a food critic. The results were not what they expected. The Case of Il Giardino A Vancouver-based Italian restaurant, Il Giardino, was a local favorite. It’s known for its classic pasta dishes and cozy atmosphere. But in 2011, the restaurant’s reputation was challenged. The trouble began when a respected food critic, Colin Thomas, wrote a review that painted the restaurant in a negative light. He described the food as bland, overpriced, and lacking the warmth it once had. The owners of Il Giardino were furious. They felt that Thomas’ words were not just harsh but unfair and damaging. They believed his review crossed the line and hurt their business. So, they decided to take legal action and sue him for defamation. The Lawsuit That Backfired This lawsuit was something new and big news indeed. It’s not every day that you get to see a restaurant sue a critic. Many people were curious about how it would turn out. The owners argued that the review was defamatory and claimed it had caused them to lose customers and money. But fighting a food critic in court is tricky. Critics are protected under free speech laws. The court decided that Thomas’ review was an opinion, not a statement of fact. It didn’t meet the standard for defamation. The case was dismissed. Instead of fixing their problem, Il Giardino made it worse. The lawsuit brought more attention to the bad review. News outlets covered the story, and people talked about it on social media. What might have been forgotten in a week was now in the spotlight for months. The restaurant's online reputation suffered more than it did from the original review. Why Suing Critics Is Risky When a restaurant fights back, it backfires on them. And it’s not really a smart move to sue a food critic. Here’s why – 1. Freedom of Speech Critics have the right to share their opinions. If a review is based on an experience and doesn’t include false claims, it is protected as free speech. Courts are careful about setting a precedent that could limit this freedom. 2. The Streisand Effect Trying to silence a critic can lead to more attention. This is known as the Streisand Effect, named after Barbra Streisand, who tried to hide photos of her home but ended up drawing more attention to them. The same happened to Il Giardino. Their attempt to stop the review only made it more popular. 3. Public Backlash People don’t like it when businesses try to suppress opinions. It can make a restaurant look like it can’t handle criticism or is trying to bully a writer. This can lead to backlash and damage a brand’s reputation. Lessons Learned from the McDonald’s Case Even major brands like McDonald’s have faced backlash for going after critics. In 1990, McDonald’s sued two environmental activists in the UK for distributing pamphlets that accused the company of poor practices. The case became known as the "McLibel" trial and lasted ten years. The outcome? A PR disaster for McDonald’s. The activists couldn’t pay damages, but they won public support. McDonald’s spent millions on legal fees and looked like the villain. The company’s reputation took a hit, showing that even large corporations can face consequences when they overreact to criticism. How to Handle Criticism as a Restaurant? It’s not uncommon these days for a brand to get backlash from critics or customers. But how they handle it makes all the difference. Some of the tactics below work really well to handle criticism: 1. Respond Calmly and Professionally A calm response can go a long way. Thank the critic for their feedback and mention any changes you plan to make. This shows that the restaurant values customer opinions and is willing to improve. 2. Focus on Positive Reviews A bad review hurts, but it doesn’t define a restaurant. Focus on encouraging happy customers to leave positive reviews. A mix of reviews shows that a restaurant is real and popular. According to BrightLocal, 87% of consumers read online reviews for local businesses. A few negative reviews won’t hurt as much if there are plenty of positive ones. 3. Improve Feedback Sometimes, criticism has truth in it. Look at what the critic pointed out and see if there are ways to improve. This can help turn a negative into a positive. It shows customers that the restaurant listens and evolves. 4. Invest in Online Reputation Management If a bad review is causing ongoing issues, using an online reputation management service can help. These services can guide a restaurant on how to boost its online image and deal with negative press. Recommendations for Restaurant Owners Before your business has to handle something as harsh, it’s better to build some ground rules that keep your business away from such events.  Think Before Reacting It’s natural to feel upset after reading a harsh review, but it’s important to think before acting. Responding to anger or taking legal action can lead to bigger problems. Provide Exceptional Customer Service The foundation for a good business reputation starts with a business capability of delivering class-A customer service. So, start by training your team. Warm and attentive staff attract more customers and build a good impression about your restaurant among clients. With open communication, your staff will take the business extra mile and exceed customer expectations.  Communicate with Your Team Make sure your team knows how to handle criticism. Training staff to respond professionally and with empathy can keep the restaurant’s image strong. Don’t Compromise in the Food Quality If the raw materials start to cost more, your customers may understand if the price goes high by a little. But, lowering food quality to adjust food prices can do damage to your restaurant in the long run. Always use fresh and high-quality ingredients to make food. Consistency in the quality of your food is the key to how you will succeed. Stay Engaged with Customers Interact with customers on review sites and social media. Show that you care about their experiences, good or bad. This connection can build loyalty and encourage repeat visits. The Takeaway Il Giardino’s attempt to sue a food critic for defamation is a reminder that fighting criticism can often make things worse. Publicly challenging a review can lead to more attention, public backlash, and damage to a business’s reputation. Instead, restaurants should focus on learning from criticism and responding professionally. Encouraging positive feedback and engaging with customers can help maintain a strong image. And when extra help is needed, an online reputation management service can provide the right support. In the end, handling criticism with grace and using it as a tool for improvement will benefit a restaurant far more than a court case ever could. Read Also: Navigating The Maze Of Compensation Claims: Everything You Need To Know When Do You Need A Personal Injury Lawyer: A Guide For Accident Victims Do I Need A Lawyer For Probation Violations?

READ MOREDetails