7 Shocking Causes of Fake Health News & Their Consequences 

Published on: 20 January 2021 Last Updated on: 10 September 2024
Fake Health News

The term “Fake News” has existed since the 1800s but has resurged in the last decade.  

Often, one political side uses it as a defense mechanism against negative articles. The result is societal confusion over what’s true and what’s not. 

When health news becomes unreliable, the consequences are more severe. This trend, fueled by political partisanship, has become increasingly dangerous.  

Generally, mainstream media like television and print journalism maintain enough integrity to avoid spreading fake health news. However, in the social media landscape, fake stories spread rapidly with a simple click.

The Causes

The primary cause of fake health news is profit. More shares and likes equal more advertising opportunities. The healthcare industry, especially pharma, spends heavily on advertising.  

With every click generating potential revenue, it’s no surprise that some lesser “news” services embellish or even lie to grow their following. 

For example, a fake article on “Natural News” claimed the cancer industry was a scam for profit. It received 5.4 million hits, and the site’s Facebook page gained over 3 million followers.  

Popularity pays! 

In social media monetization, influencers can earn about $10 per 1,000 followers for sponsored content.  

Once they hit 1 million followers, they can make up to $1,000 per post solely through advertising. 

The Consequences

As social media continues to expand, the potential for spreading fake news also grows. The issue needs attention because the consequences can be real and even fatal.  

Some stories don’t cause direct harm, such as one claiming ginger is a better cancer treatment than chemotherapy. Still, they mislead people away from proper care. 

For patients with terminal illnesses, hope is everything. False stories, like one about a diabetes cure in Mexico, can give false hope to those desperate for solutions. The most harmful fake news encourages the use of FDA-unapproved products 

Although these stories often remain on social media, even the U.S. president once promoted a chemical as a COVID-19 cure.  

Clinical trials showed that the chemical increased heart attack risks and was not safe for such use.

The Cure

Given social media’s global reach, the best way to combat fake news is through education. 

Teaching about its dangers can prevent this from becoming a generational issue, unlike other falsehoods rooted in fear.  

Currently, many prominent social media platforms flag posts containing false or misleading information. 

People believe in fake news because it aligns with their existing beliefs. This makes government regulation challenging, especially as new social media platforms arise, vowing not to flag any content. Again, this approach is money-driven.

How to Check Whether a Health News Over Social Media is Fake 

With the deluge of health news filling up your Facebook feed, it’s important to know how to spot real from fake.  

Sure, fake news can be damn convincing these days — but there are a few good tricks of the trade to protect yourself. 

Check the Source

First and foremost, always check the source. Is the article coming from a reputable organization or a well-known health authority?  

Credible sources include government health agencies, recognized research institutions and trusted news outlets.  

If the source is obscure or lacks a professional presence, be cautious. A questionable source can be a red flag even if the information seems convincing. 

Reference Studies

Legitimate health news should reference studies, expert opinions, or credible data. If the article cites scientific research, look for links to peer-reviewed journals or established medical websites.  

Beware of articles that make sensational claims without backing them up with evidence. Even when there’s a study mentioned, ensure it’s recent, relevant, and conducted by recognized experts in the field. 

Watch for Emotional Triggers

Fake health news often relies on emotional triggers to generate clicks.  

If a post uses language like “miracle cure” or “secret the government doesn’t want you to know,” it appeals to your emotions rather than your intellect.  

Real health information is rational, calm, and devoid of sensationalism. 

Compare against other Reliable Sources

If you’re not sure if a piece of information is accurate, see if other reliable sources report similar news.  

In fact, if the news article is true, it will likely be reported by more legitimate organizations or outlets as well.  

If you only find that news on questionable sites or personal blogs, it’s better to ignore them. 

Check the Writer’s Background

Who wrote the article? Is it a doctor, a journalist with a strong history of health reporting, or an expert in the field?  

If you can’t tell, don’t know what the writer has for credentials, or don’t tie closely to health, their information may be iffy. 

Watch out for Biased (and sponsored) Content

Sometimes, content is created to sell something, whether it’s a product or an idea. Sponsored articles, particularly those highlighting supplements or treatments, are usually biased.  

Check for disclaimers and consider whether the article is more about making money than offering accurate health information. 

Publication Date

Health guidelines and research are constantly evolving. An article that’s a few years old may not be accurate or relevant anymore.  

Be sure to check when it was published to get the most current information. 

Use Fact-Checking Websites

Lastly, consult fact-checking websites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, or Health Feedback to fact-check a suspicious claim.  

These platforms research and investigate viral stories and can usually verify whether something is true or not.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Taylor Swift Postpones Rio Concert Following Fan's Death

Taylor Swift Postpones Rio Concert Following Fan’s Death: Safety Concerns 

Taylor Swift announced the cancellation of her Rio concert amid safety concerns. The high temperatures are also posing as a threat. The statement comes a night after a fan 23-year old Ana Clara Benevides Machado passed away before the singer's era tour. It was held at Nilton Santos Stadium in Rio de Janeiro. Swift posted on her Instagram stories, saying, “I’m writing this from my dressing room in the stadium. The decision has been made to postpone tonight’s show due to the extreme temperatures in Rio. The safety and wellbeing of my fans, fellow performers, and crew has to, and always will, come first.” The temperatures prevalent in Rio have become a cause for concern. There have been several concerns about the conditions at the concert venue. On Friday, the temperatures reached a height of 35 degrees Celcius in Rio. Swift fans raided the stadium to watch Swift. Video footage from the concert saw Swift perform in front of a crowd of 60,000. It also shows how water was distributed with the music stopping momentarily. “If somebody says they need water when it’s this hot, they really need it." Swift was recorded to have said so. Rio de Janeiro's Mayor Eduardo Paes spoke on the issue, “The loss of a young woman's life yesterday at the show in Engenhão is unacceptable. Obviously, we are still finding out more details about the circumstances of what happened,” he wrote. “In any case, I have already ordered the municipality's Executive Chief of Operations to demand action with the production of the show.” Brazil’s National Consumer Secretary, Wadih Damous, also spoke out following Benevides Machado’s death. He said, “In addition to the Distribution of free water, through ‘hydration islands,’ which are easily accessible and visible to the public, bottles will be allowed for personal use." Read More About: Country Music Wins Big At The 2023 Billboard Music Awards Taylor Swift Is Topping The Charts On The U.K. Board With ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)

READ MOREDetails
Taylor Swift's "1989 (Taylor's Version)" Becomes #1 On Billboard 200's

Taylor Swift’s “1989 (Taylor’s Version)” Becomes #1 On Billboard

Taylor Swift is back at the top of the charts with her album "1989 (Taylor's Version)," which has skyrocketed to No. 1 on the Billboard 200 albums chart, dated November 11. This accomplishment marks Swift's 13th No. 1 on the chart. The album made an impressive debut with 1.653 million equivalent album units earned in the United States during the week ending November 2, according to Luminate. This remarkable feat represents the largest week for any album, in terms of units earned, since Adele's "25" launched with 3.482 million units in the week ending November 25, 2015. A significant portion of "1989 (Taylor's Version)"'s first-week units, approximately 1.359 million, came from traditional album sales. This is Swift's highest sales week for any of her albums, surpassing her previous record set when the original "1989" album debuted with 1.287 million copies sold in the week ending November 2, 2014. In fact, the first-week sales of "1989 (Taylor's Version)" are the largest for any album since Adele's "25" was released. In total, since Luminate began tracking music sales electronically in 1991, the debut of "1989 (Taylor's Version)" stands as the sixth-largest sales week for any album. The top six biggest weeks belong to Adele's "25," *NSYNC's "No Strings Attached," *NSYNC's "Celebrity," Eminem's "The Marshall Mathers LP," Backstreet Boys' "Black & Blue," and now "1989 (Taylor's Version)." The success of "1989 (Taylor's Version)" was amplified by its availability in various collectible physical formats, including color vinyl variants, CD editions, and digital download options. In addition, Billboard mentioned that “All 13 of Swift’s full-length studio albums and re-recorded projects from 2008’s Fearless, her second studio album, through 2023’s 1989 (Taylor’s Version) have debuted at No. 1.” This has solidified her record for the most No. 1s among women in the chart's history. She now ties with Drake for the third most No. 1 albums among all artists, with The Beatles holding the top spot with 19 No. 1s. Swift announced "1989 (Taylor's Version)" during her performance at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, as part of her "The Eras Tour" in August. Pre-order sales for the album began shortly thereafter via Swift's official webstore. In summary, Taylor Swift's triumphant return to the No. 1 spot on the Billboard 200 albums chart with "1989 (Taylor's Version)" is a testament to her enduring popularity and the anticipation for her re-recorded albums.Additionally, SEVENTEEN makes a strong debut at No. 2 on the chart with "SEVENTEENTH Heaven: 11th Mini Album," marking their fourth top 10-charting effort. The rest of the top 10 includes familiar names like Drake, Bad Bunny, Morgan Wallen, Rod Wave, and another of Swift's albums, "Midnights." Read Also: HBO Max Decides To Take Away 4K From Ad-Free Subscription Plans Elon Musk To Introduce New Products That Will Challenge YouTube And LinkedIn YouTube Premium Introduces International Price Hikes After Cracking Down Ad Blockers

READ MOREDetails
Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing

Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing Feature Misrepresentation

In a recent development, tech giant Apple has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million to settle a 2019 class-action lawsuit, accusing the company of misrepresenting its Family Sharing feature. Despite Apple denying any wrongdoing, the settlement addresses allegations that the company falsely portrayed the capability to share app subscriptions within family groups. Apple’s settlement case is making headlines following Facebook. The lawsuit contended that a significant portion of subscription-based apps, a growing segment on the Apple platform, couldn't be shared among designated family members, contrary to the representation made by Apple. Court documents revealed that these apps were exclusively available to individual users who downloaded and subscribed to them. The court documents emphasized, "The vast majority of subscription-based apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members." This revelation challenges Apple's previous assertion and sheds light on a potentially misleading practice. Furthermore, the documents highlighted that despite the awareness that subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, Apple continued advertising these apps' features. This advertising strategy may have led millions of consumers to download subscription-based apps, assuming they were shareable within family groups, only to discover otherwise after making payments. While settling the lawsuit, Apple maintains its denial of misrepresentation or wrongdoing. The $25 million settlement resolves the class-action suit, concluding the legal dispute over the Family Sharing feature. This development raises questions about the transparency of subscription-based apps on Apple's platform and the need for clearer communication between the tech giant and its users. As the landscape of app usage evolves, consumers may become more vigilant about the representations made by tech companies, ensuring that advertised features align with actual functionalities. This settlement serves as a reminder for consumers and tech companies to maintain transparency and accuracy in representing features and functionalities, fostering trust in the dynamic world of digital platforms. Read Also: Time Magazine Names Taylor Swift The 2023 Person Of The Year This Is Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording Selena Gomez Gets A Kiss From Bestie Taylor Swift In Latest Birthday Instagram Post

READ MOREDetails