It is not surprising to see rivalry in gaming. Fans have witnessed many streamers like iiTzTimmy compete in many professional tournaments. But now a new rivalry is brewing between two streamers: Daltoosh and Dr Disrespect. But this rivalry may not be in the gaming field as many fans would think.
For those who don’t know Daltoosh is a streamer for the eSports organization TSM. He streams mainly games like Apex Legends. On the other hand Dr Disrespect has made a name for himself with his mastery of FPS games. However, the two gamers are competing in an entirely different category.
In a latest build up, many gaming streamers started playing golf in a Lexus-Esports Awards 2023 event. Many gamers such as Daltoosh and fatal1ty were also present.
In between the matches, Daltoosh was asked the question, “Who is the best golfer who is also a gamer?”
Daltoosh thought about it, remarking about the number of golfers who are also gamers. After pondering long and hard DAltoosh presented Nadeshot as the best golfer-gamer. He is the founder of 100 Thieves. But he added that his own skills are equally at par with Nadeshot.
In the follow-up question Daltoosh was asked to give his views on Dr Disrespect’s golfing skills. Answering it he said, “Doc? Yeah, he can kick my a** but he’s not better at golf than me.” This answer left many fans laughing and humored.
Dr Disrespect is yet to respond to the comment made by the TSM streamer. But meanwhile fans have shared their opinion. One fan has taken Dr’s side saying, “Can you believe this guy?!”Another fan praised the question raised by the interviewers while others showed surprise over Daltoosh’s take.
Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.
The term “Fake News” has existed since the 1800s but has resurged in the last decade.
Often, one political side uses it as a defense mechanism against negative articles. The result is societal confusion over what’s true and what’s not.
When health news becomes unreliable, the consequences are more severe. This trend, fueled by political partisanship, has become increasingly dangerous.
Generally, mainstream media like television and print journalism maintain enough integrity to avoid spreading fake health news. However, in the social media landscape, fake stories spread rapidly with a simple click.
The Causes
The primary cause of fake health news is profit. More shares and likes equal more advertising opportunities. The healthcare industry, especially pharma, spends heavily on advertising.
With every click generating potential revenue, it’s no surprise that some lesser “news” services embellish or even lie to grow their following.
For example, a fake article on “Natural News” claimed the cancer industry was a scam for profit. It received 5.4 million hits, and the site’s Facebook page gained over 3 million followers.
Popularity pays!
In social media monetization, influencers can earn about $10 per 1,000 followers for sponsored content.
Once they hit 1 million followers, they can make up to $1,000 per post solely through advertising.
The Consequences
As social media continues to expand, the potential for spreading fake news also grows. The issue needs attention because the consequences can be real and even fatal.
Some stories don’t cause direct harm, such as one claiming ginger is a better cancer treatment than chemotherapy. Still, they mislead people away from proper care.
For patients with terminal illnesses, hope is everything. False stories, like one about a diabetes cure in Mexico, can give false hope to those desperate for solutions. The most harmful fake news encourages the use of FDA-unapproved products.
Although these stories often remain on social media, even the U.S. president once promoted a chemical as a COVID-19 cure.
Clinical trials showed that the chemical increased heart attack risks and was not safe for such use.
The Cure
Given social media’s global reach, the best way to combat fake news is through education.
Teaching about its dangers can prevent this from becoming a generational issue, unlike other falsehoods rooted in fear.
Currently, many prominent social media platforms flag posts containing false or misleading information.
People believe in fake news because it aligns with their existing beliefs. This makes government regulation challenging, especially as new social media platforms arise, vowing not to flag any content. Again, this approach is money-driven.
How to Check Whether a Health News Over Social Media is Fake
With the deluge of health news filling up your Facebook feed, it’s important to know how to spot real from fake.
Sure, fake news can be damn convincing these days — but there are a few good tricks of the trade to protect yourself.
Check the Source
First and foremost, always check the source. Is the article coming from a reputable organization or a well-known health authority?
Credible sources include government health agencies, recognized research institutions and trusted news outlets.
If the source is obscure or lacks a professional presence, be cautious. A questionable source can be a red flag even if the information seems convincing.
Reference Studies
Legitimate health news should reference studies, expert opinions, or credible data. If the article cites scientific research, look for links to peer-reviewed journals or established medical websites.
Beware of articles that make sensational claims without backing them up with evidence. Even when there’s a study mentioned, ensure it’s recent, relevant, and conducted by recognized experts in the field.
Watch for Emotional Triggers
Fake health news often relies on emotional triggers to generate clicks.
If a post uses language like “miracle cure” or “secret the government doesn’t want you to know,” it appeals to your emotions rather than your intellect.
Real health information is rational, calm, and devoid of sensationalism.
Compare against other Reliable Sources
If you’re not sure if a piece of information is accurate, see if other reliable sources report similar news.
In fact, if the news article is true, it will likely be reported by more legitimate organizations or outlets as well.
If you only find that news on questionable sites or personal blogs, it’s better to ignore them.
Check the Writer’s Background
Who wrote the article? Is it a doctor, a journalist with a strong history of health reporting, or an expert in the field?
If you can’t tell, don’t know what the writer has for credentials, or don’t tie closely to health, their information may be iffy.
Watch out for Biased (and sponsored) Content
Sometimes, content is created to sell something, whether it’s a product or an idea. Sponsored articles, particularly those highlighting supplements or treatments, are usually biased.
Check for disclaimers and consider whether the article is more about making money than offering accurate health information.
Publication Date
Health guidelines and research are constantly evolving. An article that’s a few years old may not be accurate or relevant anymore.
Be sure to check when it was published to get the most current information.
Use Fact-Checking Websites
Lastly, consult fact-checking websites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, or Health Feedback to fact-check a suspicious claim.
These platforms research and investigate viral stories and can usually verify whether something is true or not.
Read Also:
How to Keep up on the Latest News
How Cutting Edge Technology is Helping Dubai Improve its Healthcare Services
Health Tips For Managing High Cholesterol
In a recent development, tech giant Apple has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million to settle a 2019 class-action lawsuit, accusing the company of misrepresenting its Family Sharing feature. Despite Apple denying any wrongdoing, the settlement addresses allegations that the company falsely portrayed the capability to share app subscriptions within family groups.
Apple’s settlement case is making headlines following Facebook. The lawsuit contended that a significant portion of subscription-based apps, a growing segment on the Apple platform, couldn't be shared among designated family members, contrary to the representation made by Apple. Court documents revealed that these apps were exclusively available to individual users who downloaded and subscribed to them.
The court documents emphasized, "The vast majority of subscription-based apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members." This revelation challenges Apple's previous assertion and sheds light on a potentially misleading practice.
Furthermore, the documents highlighted that despite the awareness that subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, Apple continued advertising these apps' features. This advertising strategy may have led millions of consumers to download subscription-based apps, assuming they were shareable within family groups, only to discover otherwise after making payments.
While settling the lawsuit, Apple maintains its denial of misrepresentation or wrongdoing. The $25 million settlement resolves the class-action suit, concluding the legal dispute over the Family Sharing feature.
This development raises questions about the transparency of subscription-based apps on Apple's platform and the need for clearer communication between the tech giant and its users. As the landscape of app usage evolves, consumers may become more vigilant about the representations made by tech companies, ensuring that advertised features align with actual functionalities.
This settlement serves as a reminder for consumers and tech companies to maintain transparency and accuracy in representing features and functionalities, fostering trust in the dynamic world of digital platforms.
Read Also:
Time Magazine Names Taylor Swift The 2023 Person Of The Year
This Is Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording
Selena Gomez Gets A Kiss From Bestie Taylor Swift In Latest Birthday Instagram Post
The front entrance to Route 58 retail store now has signs announcing "STORE CLOSING", "NOTHING HELD BACK", and "ENTIRE STORE UP TO 20%". There were even two designated storekeepers standing on the sidewalk of Route 58 holding the store closing sign this morning.
Their company spokesperson was not immediately available for comment. Representatives of the real estate agency in Queens that advertised the other two smaller rents in Staples Plaza (where Big Lots is situated) also weren't reachable for comment.
The Big Lots was originally occupied by a permanent home store. The plaza was opened in the 1980s. Later on the space got occupied by Ultimate Fitness East. They moved out in the summer of 2013. In that fall, a store of Big Lots launched there.
Big Lots is a publicly traded organization operating 1,422 stores in 48 states all across the U.S. The company's investor relations website reveals.
The big box retailer is expected to showcase its third-quarter results to all its investors on Thursday. It has struggled in recent years, with its stock value plummeting more than $39 per share in the last five years to a sinking $4.14 per share yesterday.
Big Lots Inc. has seen a huge downturn in both its revenues as well as net income year after year in the fiscal year of 2023 so far. In January, the company announced that it would close some stores in its larger urban markets in California and Colorado.
Read Also:
Is Walmart Open On Thanksgiving? Here Is A List Of What’s Open
Pinterest Launched A New Education And Information Hub For Creators
Taylor Swift Sings ‘Say Don’t Go’ ‘It’s Time To Go’ Live At The Final Eras Tour Show
