Difference Of Opinions About Paralegals And Legal Assistants

Published on: 19 March 2021 Last Updated on: 27 December 2024
Paralegals And Legal Assistants

Working in law is not an easy endeavor. Multiple roles and designations keep this sector afloat. While lawyers and judges are primarily associated with law, you can’t ignore the importance of paralegals and legal assistants who ensure that the court system can do its job. Even though you are working for a lawyer as an assistant and paralegal, these are not the same job professions. Here’s how both career paths differentiate from each other:

What Do They Do?

What Do They Do

Understanding what their jobs entail is an excellent place to start to build your knowledge on what a paralegal does compare to a legal assistant, and here’s how:

Paralegal:

As a paralegal, you are helping a lawyer with their cases. That means you conduct all relevant research work on laws and draft legal documents with the best supporting evidence for a lawyer to be used in court.

They also assist a lawyer prepare trail reports and file appeals with the opposing counsel. Since paralegals also specialize in criminal law, real estate law, and immigration policies, they have the legal rights to bill clients for their work. However, legal assistants cannot do the same.

As a legal assistant, your job is more on the administrative side than regular work. You will help a lawyer prepare legal documents such as subpoenas and take their phone calls for them.

You’re also critical in reminding the lawyer about their court appearances and helping them schedule their appointments and workload. You will also be vital in greeting clients and ensuring all emails get a response. Your work will include organizing all the relevant paperwork a lawyer may need, such as statements and evidence, and file them appropriately. Finally, you prepare bills for a lawyer’s clients, but you cannot bill them for your services.

However, suppose you wish to try your hand as in law and work your way from a paralegal to an independent lawyer. In that case, there are many exciting and well-structured online programs for you, such as an online criminal justice degree. This degree is not only the first stepping stone into your promising career. Still, it provides you with the necessary resources to do well as a legal practitioner.

Where Do These Fields Differ?

When you are aware of what a legal assistant’s and a paralegal’s job entails, it is easy to dive deeper and study their differences more comprehensively:

1. Skills:

As a paralegal, you may find yourself sharing certain skill sets with a legal assistant. However, since your job requires you to work within the legal framework, you should know how to take legal actions known as litigation charges organization breach of contract. You will need to know how to use Microsoft Office or any equivalent word processor to prepare your documents. Also, learn how to compile a proper document that follows standard documentation format. You will need to know how to carry out research and make use of the evidence you have.

You will need to schedule meetings and remind the lawyer to attend all-important court appearances and meetings. You should know the basic law framework and know-how to enter all relevant data.

2. Experience:

Most law firms ask for paralegals who have some experience of working in law. Most ask for at least a minimum of three to five years of work experience. Suppose you go with only entry-level expertise with no experience to only two years of experience. Chances are you may not get a job as a paralegal and given the competition in this sector alone. You trim down your options further if you don’t take advantage of every opportunity before applying for a job.

As a legal assistant, your job experience is not under heavy scrutiny. Whether you’re new to the job or have been working for a while, you can quickly secure a job yourself. It is not unheard of for paralegals to start as legal assistants and interns before applying for higher employment opportunities till they’re eligible to work as a paralegal.

3. Salary:

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, most paralegals can earn $49,500, while a legal assistant can earn $44,180. However, these wages can go higher, and in 2019, they had crossed the $50,000th mark. Your salaries mainly depend on your employer. If you choose to work in a private setting than a non-profit, you have higher chances of earning more.

4. Education:

As a paralegal, you will need to have solid formal education to find employment. You will need to attend a bachelor’s program in legal studies or paralegal studies. Then appear for your examinations. You will also need to intern while you study. And getting work right after your bachelor’s may become problematic if you choose to skip out on all opportunities and directly apply to a law firm.

As a legal assistant, you may need to look into a bachelor’s degree and get a certificate in paralegal studies. However, you may start your job right away after you graduate as a legal assistant. You don’t need to do many internships, but it helps to walk in with some experience.

Wrap Up:

If you are looking for a law career, becoming a paralegal or a legal assistant is a good start. These two professions are just as important as the lawyer itself. Without the proper help, a lawyer may struggle in staying on top of their cases and not know how to make compelling cases. As a paralegal, your job will be working with the lawyer and their clients, especially for the legal system. As a legal assistant, you will make sure all appointments happen on time. All relevant documents are in the system.

Clear Career Path Advice 

One area missing in this debate is clear advice on which path might be best for you. While the differences between a paralegal and a legal assistant are outlined, it’s important to help you figure out which role fits your skills and interests.  

If you prefer administrative work, becoming a legal assistant may be more appealing.  

However, if you love doing legal research and working directly with clients, the paralegal route might be a better fit. So, reflect on what you enjoy most! 

 Day-to-Day Tasks 

It would also help to include more real-life examples of what a typical day looks like for both roles.  

For instance, a legal assistant might start the day answering calls and organizing files, while a paralegal could be deep in legal research for an upcoming trial.  

This way, you can get a clearer idea of what your day-to-day might look like in either role. 

Future Career Growth 

Another missing point is career growth opportunities for both positions. Where could these roles take you in the future?  

As a legal assistant, you might eventually become a paralegal, and as a paralegal, you could decide to go to law school and become a lawyer. These roles could be stepping stones to bigger career opportunities if you want to advance further in the legal field. 

You do not have to be stuck in either of the positions! 

Read Also:

 

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Winning Your Premises Liability Claim

Winning Your Premises Liability Claim: Law and Building Codes

Navigating a premises liability claim requires a deep understanding of how law intertwines with building codes. When accidents occur on someone else's property, determining liability often hinges on the adherence to, or violation of, these codes. Contacting Legal Assistance For Premises Liability Claims If you believe your injury was a result of a building code violation, it is crucial to seek legal advice. For expert guidance in such matters, consider having the proper connections with your agents, like the contact Christensen Law Firm. Good lawyers can always provide invaluable assistance in navigating the complexities of your claim, helping you understand your legal rights and the intricacies of building codes as they apply to your case. The Role Of Building Codes In Premises Liability Building codes is established to protect individuals from a wide range of hazards, including unsafe wiring, fire risks, and structural integrity issues. These codes serve as a baseline for safety standards that property owners must adhere to. In premises liability cases, if a property owner, architect, or contractor fails to follow these codes, they can be held liable for any resulting accidents. This liability stems from their responsibility to exercise reasonable care in maintaining a safe environment. Building Code Compliance And Legal Defense It's important to note that compliance with building codes does not necessarily provide a complete defense in a premises liability case. While adherence to these codes might protect a defendant from being considered negligent per se, it does not automatically establish due care. Therefore, even if a property owner has followed building codes, they can still be held liable if they fail to provide a reasonably safe environment. Examples Of Building Code Violations Leading To Liability Premises liability cases can arise from a variety of building code violations, such as: - Defective stairs leading to slip and fall incidents. - Injuries from exposed electrical wiring or structural failures. - Accidents due to missing handrails or non-functioning carbon monoxide detectors. These examples illustrate how failure to comply with building codes can be considered negligence, forming the basis for a premises liability claim. Read Also: The Impact Of Human Rights Legislation On Disability Discrimination Cases Assigning Liability In Building Code Violation Cases Determining liability in these cases can be complex, involving multiple parties such as property owners, architects, contractors, and their respective insurance companies. Each party's role and responsibility in maintaining or violating building codes must be carefully examined to establish who is at fault. Successfully navigating a premises liability claim where building codes are a factor requires a nuanced approach. It involves not only a deep understanding of the relevant laws and codes but also the ability to effectively demonstrate how these codes were violated and led to injury. Legal expertise, detailed investigation, and expert testimony are all essential elements in building a strong case. Understanding The Impact Of Negligence In Building Code Violations In premises liability claims, establishing negligence is a critical step. Building code violations can be a key factor in proving negligence. For example, if a property owner ignores a known hazard, such as a broken stairwell that violates building codes, and this leads to an injury, the owner can be held liable. The victim’s legal team must demonstrate that the property owner’s failure to adhere to the code directly contributed to the injury. The Challenges In Proving Liability Proving liability in premises liability cases involving building code violations can be challenging. It requires a thorough understanding of both the specific codes relevant to the case and the circumstances of the accident. For instance, a building code violation might be considered negligence per se, but only if it directly caused the injury. If the violation was unrelated to the incident, it might not support the claim. Therefore, detailed investigation and legal expertise are crucial in these cases. The Importance Of Expert Testimony In Premises Liability Claims Expert testimony often plays a pivotal role in premises liability cases, especially when building codes are involved. Experts in fields like construction, architecture, and engineering can provide insights into how a violation of building codes may have led to unsafe conditions. Their testimony can help clarify complex technical details and establish a clear link between the violation and the accident. The Bottom Line Winning a premises liability claim often hinges on the intricate relationship between legal principles and building codes. Understanding this relationship is key to establishing liability and securing the compensation you deserve. Remember, while adherence to building codes is a significant factor, it does not always absolve property owners from responsibility in the event of an accident. Read Also: 3 Personality Traits of a Successful and High-Ranking Criminal Lawyer 5 Reasons Why You Should Take A Criminal Lawsuit Seriously Criminal Case – Dos And Donts

READ MOREDetails
Best Lawyer

Tips and Tricks to Hire the Best Lawyer for Your Case

Having the best lawyer to help you with your cause is critical when you need legal aid. Not all lawyers are the same. To have the right legal team fighting for you can mean the difference between getting the right outcome in court and wondering what went wrong. If you're not familiar with the legal system, it can be difficult to know if you've got a lawyer that's up to the task. Here are several tips to hire the best lawyer. Keep reading and learn more here. Here are several tips to hire the best lawyer: Where to Search Besides the internet search, phone book and a friend who might suggest a lawyer, there are many other sources to find a qualified lawyer. Some organizations offer design to their members, as does the AARP. Moreover, military members are often entitled to some representation, as are some people covered by the umbrella and home insurance policies. Ultimately, the AB Association can also assist you to find a suitable lawyer in your state who is licensed. Find a trustworthy Lawyer Now that you know where to find a lawyer, you need to hire an honest one. You can do this by meeting lawyers through free initial consultations. Many lawyers offer free initial consultations. Use that to your benefit. Use the conference to determine if the lawyer is honest and inevitable. Naturally, some people have the capacity to evaluate the character of an individual within a couple of minutes of communicating with the person; nevertheless, there are some personality characteristics that may also shift you off. Is the prosecutor, for example, searching at you in the sight while relating to you or is he or she staring at the ground? Often, inquire what types of cases they have contested in history. If you are looking for a payout they should be willing to provide you with compensation payments for similar cases to yours. It's essential to feel safe in the knowledge that your lawyer is a trustworthy person before entering into any official relationship. Finding out that the lawyer symbolizing you is damaging your claim because of their dubious credibility would be equally disturbing. Read up on reviews because these are essential. Seek an Experienced Lawyer While having a lawyer that you can trust is essential, it is equally essential that they have great experience in the field of law for which you require their help. For example, you should use an attorney with expertise in property planning to plan your will, a divorce attorney to select divorce papers and a trial attorney to serve you in a criminal matter. General practitioners are ideal for single real estate sales or other non-complex things but their lack of accurate knowledge and expertise in a given field will hurt your case. Consider the Volume of the Lawyer’s Firm Hiring an attorney from a little firm provides advantages. In most cases, you get prompt, personalized attention. Moreover, the lawyer you represent will apparently have a fairly large amount of time to devote to your case. This may not be the place at big firms, where lawyers often have to juggle many cases and may possess a lot of responsibilities towards the firm and its associates that might attract their awareness away from your requirements. Large firms, however, have advantages too. After all, for the cases, they have taken, and their capacity to control decisions, various opposing lawyers and judges cherish and/or fear large respected firms. Generally, big firms also have greater money and labor capacity to study the case and formulate a strategy. Read Also: Keys to Become a Successful Lawyer 5 Ingredients of a Healthy Relationship: Is Your Relationship Healthy?

READ MOREDetails
Employment Attorney Law Firm In California

Why You Need To Consult With Employment Attorney Law Firm In California?

In the cases of whistleblowers, or employees who have been returned to the workplace after winning a wrongful termination suit, any action taken by an employer that is "materially detrimental" to an employee is considered retaliatory under the law. The following are examples of materially detrimental actions: Dismissal Being moved to a less desired position Being passed over for a promotion Not being hired/promoted are all examples of adverse employment actions. In addition, significantly unfavorable actions are measures that an employer might use to discourage an employee from engaging in a protected activity are also prohibited. Some of these unfavorable actions might include: Negating compensation for work. Click here for more on employee compensation. Suspending Any abuse or threats Damaging, erroneous assessments of, or reports about, family members' treatment So What May You Do Without Fear Of Reprisal? According to the statute, workers are shielded from retaliation for engaging in certain "protected activities." The following statutes establish these guaranteed rights, and the EEOC is responsible for enforcing most of them. Relevant laws are: Specifically, the (ADA), The Age Discrimination in the Workplace Act (ADEA) The Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 Section 501 of said Rehabilitation Act There are also laws protecting employees' right to fair compensation and privacy of medical information and the safeguarding of employee privileges The US Dept of Labor established OSHA to shield workers who blow the whistle by filing complaints or exercising their rights from any kind of reprisal. Go to Whistleblowers.gov for additional information. There are strict deadlines for reporting retaliation that must be met before a claim can be filed with OSHA. Three Broad Types Of Lawful Pursuits These broad categories are summarized in this article and include the vast majority of legally sanctioned pursuits: If an employee has a good faith and reasonable suspicion that their employer is engaging in unlawful conduct, he or she has a duty to disclose this suspicion, either to the company's internal compliance department or to the appropriate authorities. An employer cannot take any action against an employee that would have a "materially detrimental effect" because of this protected behavior. Real-world scenarios where an employee could disclose criminal activity include: Disclose sexual harassment incidents Having experienced prejudice of some kind Confronting dangerous workplace circumstances and reporting them False claims that the employer violated the law by not paying overtime or providing mandatory breaks What is known as "whistleblowing" is a distinct field, however, any of these circumstances may be covered under the broad term of whistleblowing. Possessing And Using One's Employee Rights Many different agencies, both federal and state, have tackled the issue of protecting workers' rights. Limits on drug testing, the right to a minimum salary, paid and unpaid parental leave, the ability to return to civilian employment after military duty, the right to a safe and healthy workplace environment, etc. all fall within this vast category of employment law. The threat of retaliatory wrongful termination (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful) exists whenever an employee seeks to exercise a legal privilege that is not to the liking of the employer. Here are some frequent instances in which an employer may retaliate against a worker who is only asserting his or her rights: Making a request for reasonable accommodations due to a disability or religious beliefs Asking for a cut of tips received Using paid time off for things like medical leave or civic duties like voting or jury duty Taking part in a government inquiry - Employees have the right to take part in any legal proceedings, including investigations and hearings, that involve their employer. This includes situations when an employee is asked to testify against their employer in court or when they voluntarily offer information to government authorities about the company's procedures. There is an almost infinite list of potential motives for retaliation against a worker. Retaliation cases have the largest volume and proportion of all EEOC claims. Retaliation allegations have been on the rise over the years, now making up about 45 percent of all claims filed with the commission. Verifying Retaliation These three conditions must be met before an employee may file a claim with the EEOC against their employer: There had been a protected event. Employer reprimand or discipline All of the aforementioned are linked together because of a causal relationship, which proves retaliation. It is reasonably difficult to prove the third criterion, the connection between the employee's protected action and their subsequent firing. There can always be a “reason” for employee termination, especially in a right-to-work state. This means any and all evidence to the claim must be handled in a timely and efficient manner by an employment attorney to provide the appropriate documentation to file a case. The link might be established based on either direct or circumstantial evidence. Finding remarks in writing or verbally that show the case is an example of direct evidence, whereas circumstances that suggest retribution were taken into account indirectly are examples of circumstantial evidence. The burden of proof is with the employee; it is not on the employer to refute the allegation. For retaliation to be presumed to have taken place, there must be evidence that supports that likelihood. Protections Against Retaliation If the court finds that retaliation occurred, the following compensation is possible: Pay in advance or readmission to work pending employment Discretionary funds The costs you spent before, during, and after your employment ended unfairly Legal costs and time in court Compensation for mental anguish Damage awards against private companies as punishment In many instances of retaliation, the parties are able to come to an agreement out of court and avoid going to trial. The amount of a retaliation settlement is determined by the nature of the dispute and the likelihood of the result. Companies often choose to settle employment disputes rather than risk the high costs of litigation if an employee has a compelling case. However, it is always important to speak with a professional employment attorney as quickly as possible in order to ascertain the validity of your case. Read Also: Can an Employee Claims for a Personal Injury When Working From Home? Understanding How Employee Recognition Can Aid Your Consulting Firm Picking the Right Law Firm for You and Your Family

READ MOREDetails