Evolution of the U.S. Patent System

Published on: 10 January 2019 Last Updated on: 08 August 2019
Patent

Patents have actually existed since the 1300s when an inventor was granted a right to a monopoly. While the specifics of the grants, the complexity of the issuing process, and the number of patents that exist have greatly expanded, the principle idea of the right has not changed significantly. However, we now have a robust industry of patent attorneys like Tampa’s The Patent Professor, a profession you probably wouldn’t have stumbled across in the Medieval times. Read more below about the evolution of the United States patent system to what we know it to be today:

The Colonial Period:

In the Colonies, there was no set patent process or a centralized patent office, since each colony operated essentially as a completely individual territory under the British monarchy. However, each colony issued “patents” on a case-by-case basis, with the first being issued to Samuel Winslow by the Governor of Massachusetts in 1641. Winslow was granted a 10-year monopoly on a particular method of harvesting salt.

Adoption of the US Constitution:

In Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, there is a provision that specifically addresses the protection of intellectual property. This was the first official mention of a patent in US documentation and signaled that the United States would support innovation with legal tools that allowed term-limited “monopolies” on registered inventions.

The Patent Acts:

1790:

3 years after the adoption of the US Constitution by the newly formed United States, the Patent Act of 1790 was passed. It gave limited protections, a short, 14-year term for protection, and was found to be fairly unsatisfactory to most concerned citizens of the new country. It would only last a few years before being replaced.

1793:

In 1793, the modern definition of a patent was introduced, and the application process was simplified. This Patent Act stood for over 50 years and granted over 10,000 patents before being updated once more.

1836:

In 1836, a new Act was passed that formally established the United States Patent Office, whereas previous patent applicants had to appeal directly to the Secretary of State (and in the first Patent Act, to the Attorney General and Secretary of War as well). In addition, it created a database of all existing patents, available in public libraries, so that people could research before submitting their application to ensure that it was a truly original idea. Finally, it created the option for patent holders to extend from 14 to 21 years in some cases.

Depression and Anti-Patent Sentiments:

In the 1890 Depression, and again during the Great Depression, US citizens held an exceptionally negative attitude towards patents, and these sentiments led to the establishment of antitrust laws. These laws created limitations on the monopolies that major corporations were able to form and gave power back to the smaller players of the industry.

The Modern United States Patent and Trademark Office:

The Patent Act of 1952 created the current patent system as we know it today. It added additional stipulations for the final approval of a patent, such as ways that it could be infringed, explaining how it is useful and non-obvious, and other details that are still present in the application process to the USPTO.

Patent law is constantly evolving, and as more patents and new technologies develop, you can be certain that they will continue to evolve, even more rapidly as the rate of innovation increases.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Tribune Review

Tribune Review – Is It A Good News Website In 2022?

In these busy lives, we hardly get time to read a newspaper on a regular basis. Still, some people try to follow a daily per day to keep their pace up with this fast-moving world. Thanks to the E-news system, which is making our lives easier. Some of the world-famous online newspapers daily are New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post,  Reuters, ABC News, etc. But have you heard about Tribune Review? I am sure you have; otherwise, you would not have been here today. Tribune Review or Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is the 2nd largest daily newspaper of Pittsburgh Metropolitan, Pennsylvania, United States. What is offered to the readers? Is it worth following? What are its pros and cons? Learn everything today from this detailed Tribune-Review Newspaper guide.    What Tribune Review Is All About? Tribune Review, or Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, a.k.a., The Trib is Pittsburgh’s second-largest daily. Not only the largest, but also it is one of the oldest newspaper organizations in the United States. It came into being for the first time in 1811 as the Greensburg Gazette while in 1889, it merged with many more papers to form Greensburg Tribune Review. Later, in 1992, it became metropolitan-wide and started serving the entire Pittsburgh Metropolitan area. Since 1st December 2016, it transformed into an all-digital format, following which, its popularity rose immensely. Even after changing the format, it occupies the 2nd position among the top daily newspaper list in Pennsylvania.  Where Is the Tribune Review Located? As you all know now Tribune Review is a reputed English daily of the Pittsburgh Metropolitan area in Pennsylvania. But where is its headquarters exactly located? Well, the headquarter of Tribune-Review Newspaper (former known as Greensburg Tribune-Review) is at: 503 Martindale St. 3rd FloorPittsburgh, PA 15212 United States At present, three geographic regions publish Tribune Review - Pittsburgh, Westmoreland, Valley News Dispatch. Owned by Tribune-Review Publishing company, the publisher here is none other than Richard Mellon Scaife.   How Did Tribune Review Come Into Being? Just like the Wall Street Journal, or the New York Times, The Tribune-Review also has a history related to its origin. However, we are keeping it short over here to give you a crispy quality reading experience. On August 22, 1811, it was founded as the Gazette. Until 1955, when they united to establish the Greensburg Tribune-Review, both journals continued to be published separately. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review got under the ownership of Richard Mellon Scaife in 1970. Trib Total Media declared in November 2015 that it would reduce the home delivery of printed newspapers in favor of digital distribution. The sale of two days and six weeklies to West Penn Media was part of this reorganization. National Attention And Investigation Tribune Review gained national attention, and even international attention several times because of specific events. You can call them ‘Disasters’ or ‘blessing,’ but these are the factors that brought the organization under the limelight. Let’s do a quick review of one memorable investigation: Carl Prine, a newspaper investigative reporter of Tribune-Review, collaborated with CBS news magazine 60 Minutes on a program. This was after the September 11, 2001 attacks. It revealed the inadequacy of protection at the country's most hazardous chemical factories. Eventually, this investigation took the recognition of the newspaper to a different level. The journalists and a CBS camera operator were arrested for trespassing at a Neville-Island plant while the inspection was ongoing. When the court decided that the story was valuable to the public, they were finally acquitted. On top of that,  there was a two-part episode of the PBS docu-series - Exposé: America's Investigative Reports in 2007. Its title was, "Think Like A Terrorist," and this included Prine's follow-up research.   What About Its Circulation? The circulation of Tribune-Review Newspaper is also quite impressive. About 187,875 happens daily while 202,181 on Sundays only. Apart from Pittsburgh Tribune Review, there are Greensburg Tribune-Review, Westmoreland Tribune Review, and Valley News Dispatch Tribune-Review Obituaries. The Tribune Review claims to have had the biggest readership growth of any newspaper in the top 48 American cities during the last five years. The number of Pgh Tribune-Review readers increased 17.8% between 2007 and 2012, says a Houston-based independent media-research organization. Shockingly, throughout Western Pennsylvania, it has strong ties with a variety of nonprofit and community-based companies and organizations. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Q1. How Much Is The Sunday Tribune-Review? The current edition of the Sunday Pgh Tribune Review arrives every week, packed with local, national, and international news. Other than this, you’ll get unique weekend features including Sunday's Food and Travel sections, TV magazines, local advertisements, and discounts. One year of Sunday home delivery for $20 ($52 value). Q2. Does The Tribune-Review Have A Print Edition? After December 1, 2016, Tribune-Review Newspaper became an all-digital English daily. At present, it does not have any print edition. The readers of Pittsburgh Tribune-Review call their favorite daily as rib these days.  Q3. Who Owns The Pittsburgh Tribune Review? Tribune Review Newspaper Daily is owned by Tribune Review Publishing Company. Furthermore, Richard Mellon Scaife is the owner/publisher here.   Q4.What Are The Two Major Newspapers In Pittsburgh? The two major newspapers in Pittsburgh is: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review or Pgh Tribune Review Pittsburgh Post Gazette What Do We Think About Tribune Review? From our extensive research about Tribune review, we can conclude that it’s recommendable for news lovers. The quality of news, level of research and authenticity, it is truly unmatchable. It hasn't got the title of 2nd largest daily in the metropolitan Pittsburgh without any reason.  Despite a national trend of declining readership, the news portal traffic is augmenting day by day. So, a big fat THUMBS Up for Pgh Tribune Review and all the Tribune-Review Obituaries from our end. What’s your opinion about Tribune Review? Do not hesitate to share with us in the comment area. Read Also: Clicka Jobs USA – Why It Is Making Headlines? How to Download Game Of Thrones Putlocker Online for Free? Is Computer Software Prepackaged Software A Good Career Path? Wpc16 Com Dashboard Review – All You Need To Know How Many Jobs Are Available In Real Estate Investment Trusts?

READ MOREDetails
Daltoosh Claims Dr Disrespect Is Not Better Than Him

Daltoosh Claims Dr Disrespect Is “Not Better” Than Him: Report 

It is not surprising to see rivalry in gaming. Fans have witnessed many streamers like iiTzTimmy compete in many professional tournaments. But now a new rivalry is brewing between two streamers: Daltoosh and Dr Disrespect. But this rivalry may not be in the gaming field as many fans would think. For those who don't know Daltoosh is a streamer for the eSports organization TSM. He streams mainly games like Apex Legends. On the other hand Dr Disrespect has made a name for himself with his mastery of FPS games. However, the two gamers are competing in an entirely different category. In a latest build up, many gaming streamers started playing golf in a Lexus-Esports Awards 2023 event. Many gamers such as Daltoosh and fatal1ty were also present. In between the matches, Daltoosh was asked the question, “Who is the best golfer who is also a gamer?” Daltoosh thought about it, remarking about the number of golfers who are also gamers. After pondering long and hard DAltoosh presented Nadeshot as the best golfer-gamer. He is the founder of 100 Thieves. But he added that his own skills are equally at par with Nadeshot. In the follow-up question Daltoosh was asked to give his views on Dr Disrespect's golfing skills. Answering it he said, “Doc? Yeah, he can kick my a** but he’s not better at golf than me." This answer left many fans laughing and humored. Dr Disrespect is yet to respond to the comment made by the TSM streamer. But meanwhile fans have shared their opinion. One fan has taken Dr's side saying, “Can you believe this guy?!”Another fan praised the question raised by the interviewers while others showed surprise over Daltoosh's take. Read More About: Is AI Changing The Insurance Sector? The Brains Behind ChatGPT: Who’s Pulling the Strings?

READ MOREDetails
Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing

Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing Feature Misrepresentation

In a recent development, tech giant Apple has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million to settle a 2019 class-action lawsuit, accusing the company of misrepresenting its Family Sharing feature. Despite Apple denying any wrongdoing, the settlement addresses allegations that the company falsely portrayed the capability to share app subscriptions within family groups. Apple’s settlement case is making headlines following Facebook. The lawsuit contended that a significant portion of subscription-based apps, a growing segment on the Apple platform, couldn't be shared among designated family members, contrary to the representation made by Apple. Court documents revealed that these apps were exclusively available to individual users who downloaded and subscribed to them. The court documents emphasized, "The vast majority of subscription-based apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members." This revelation challenges Apple's previous assertion and sheds light on a potentially misleading practice. Furthermore, the documents highlighted that despite the awareness that subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, Apple continued advertising these apps' features. This advertising strategy may have led millions of consumers to download subscription-based apps, assuming they were shareable within family groups, only to discover otherwise after making payments. While settling the lawsuit, Apple maintains its denial of misrepresentation or wrongdoing. The $25 million settlement resolves the class-action suit, concluding the legal dispute over the Family Sharing feature. This development raises questions about the transparency of subscription-based apps on Apple's platform and the need for clearer communication between the tech giant and its users. As the landscape of app usage evolves, consumers may become more vigilant about the representations made by tech companies, ensuring that advertised features align with actual functionalities. This settlement serves as a reminder for consumers and tech companies to maintain transparency and accuracy in representing features and functionalities, fostering trust in the dynamic world of digital platforms. Read Also: Time Magazine Names Taylor Swift The 2023 Person Of The Year This Is Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording Selena Gomez Gets A Kiss From Bestie Taylor Swift In Latest Birthday Instagram Post

READ MOREDetails