Evolution of the U.S. Patent System

Published on: 10 January 2019 Last Updated on: 08 August 2019
Patent

Patents have actually existed since the 1300s when an inventor was granted a right to a monopoly. While the specifics of the grants, the complexity of the issuing process, and the number of patents that exist have greatly expanded, the principle idea of the right has not changed significantly. However, we now have a robust industry of patent attorneys like Tampa’s The Patent Professor, a profession you probably wouldn’t have stumbled across in the Medieval times. Read more below about the evolution of the United States patent system to what we know it to be today:

The Colonial Period:

In the Colonies, there was no set patent process or a centralized patent office, since each colony operated essentially as a completely individual territory under the British monarchy. However, each colony issued “patents” on a case-by-case basis, with the first being issued to Samuel Winslow by the Governor of Massachusetts in 1641. Winslow was granted a 10-year monopoly on a particular method of harvesting salt.

Adoption of the US Constitution:

In Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, there is a provision that specifically addresses the protection of intellectual property. This was the first official mention of a patent in US documentation and signaled that the United States would support innovation with legal tools that allowed term-limited “monopolies” on registered inventions.

The Patent Acts:

1790:

3 years after the adoption of the US Constitution by the newly formed United States, the Patent Act of 1790 was passed. It gave limited protections, a short, 14-year term for protection, and was found to be fairly unsatisfactory to most concerned citizens of the new country. It would only last a few years before being replaced.

1793:

In 1793, the modern definition of a patent was introduced, and the application process was simplified. This Patent Act stood for over 50 years and granted over 10,000 patents before being updated once more.

1836:

In 1836, a new Act was passed that formally established the United States Patent Office, whereas previous patent applicants had to appeal directly to the Secretary of State (and in the first Patent Act, to the Attorney General and Secretary of War as well). In addition, it created a database of all existing patents, available in public libraries, so that people could research before submitting their application to ensure that it was a truly original idea. Finally, it created the option for patent holders to extend from 14 to 21 years in some cases.

Depression and Anti-Patent Sentiments:

In the 1890 Depression, and again during the Great Depression, US citizens held an exceptionally negative attitude towards patents, and these sentiments led to the establishment of antitrust laws. These laws created limitations on the monopolies that major corporations were able to form and gave power back to the smaller players of the industry.

The Modern United States Patent and Trademark Office:

The Patent Act of 1952 created the current patent system as we know it today. It added additional stipulations for the final approval of a patent, such as ways that it could be infringed, explaining how it is useful and non-obvious, and other details that are still present in the application process to the USPTO.

Patent law is constantly evolving, and as more patents and new technologies develop, you can be certain that they will continue to evolve, even more rapidly as the rate of innovation increases.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Riverhead Big Lots Is Closing Route 58 Store

Riverhead Big Lots Is Closing Route 58 Store

The front entrance to Route 58 retail store now has signs announcing "STORE CLOSING", "NOTHING HELD BACK", and "ENTIRE STORE UP TO 20%". There were even two designated storekeepers standing on the sidewalk of Route 58 holding the store closing sign this morning. Their company spokesperson was not immediately available for comment. Representatives of the real estate agency in Queens that advertised the other two smaller rents in Staples Plaza (where Big Lots is situated) also weren't reachable for comment. The Big Lots was originally occupied by a permanent home store. The plaza was opened in the 1980s. Later on the space got occupied by Ultimate Fitness East. They moved out in the summer of 2013. In that fall, a store of Big Lots launched there. Big Lots is a publicly traded organization operating 1,422 stores in 48 states all across the U.S. The company's investor relations website reveals. The big box retailer is expected to showcase its third-quarter results to all its investors on Thursday. It has struggled in recent years, with its stock value plummeting more than $39 per share in the last five years to a sinking $4.14 per share yesterday. Big Lots Inc. has seen a huge downturn in both its revenues as well as net income year after year in the fiscal year of 2023 so far. In January, the company announced that it would close some stores in its larger urban markets in California and Colorado. Read Also: Is Walmart Open On Thanksgiving? Here Is A List Of What’s Open Pinterest Launched A New Education And Information Hub For Creators Taylor Swift Sings ‘Say Don’t Go’ ‘It’s Time To Go’ Live At The Final Eras Tour Show 

READ MOREDetails

Major Regulatory Approvals for Cross Border Acquisitions

Cross-border acquisitions can be impacted by a wide range of factors, so it is essential to develop a comprehensive framework for dealing with all the aspects of the acquisition process. Such a framework was presented last year at the Spring CLE ACC event. The presentation was put together by Jason Rabbitt-Tomita and Carrie LeRoy, two partners at White Case, one of the most prestigious international law firms. Their framework included all aspects of such a transaction from the processes and the timing, to due diligence, intellectual property matters, employment considerations, dispute resolution, and tax structuring. However, the largest segment of the presentation was focused on the major regulatory approvals required in international acquisitions, as these are usually the most time consuming and the most challenging processes in cross-border transactions. Antitrust : In regards to the antitrust laws meant to promote fair competition for the benefits of the consumers, cross-border deals can be subject to numerous reviews in different jurisdictions. As such, the buyers must be prepared to engage the Antitrust counsel and present the worldwide turnover of the target company. It is essential to identify possible antitrust risks and concerns and be prepared with prompt solutions CFIUS : The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States can put major obstacles in the path or a cross-border acquisition, especially when it comes to tech companies. The major focuses of the CFIUS reviews are threats, vulnerability and risk profiles. In other words, they analyze whether foreign acquirers can exploit vulnerabilities or cause harm in matters of national security. The CFIUS approval process usually consists of consultations and other preliminary work, an initial 30-day review, a 45-day investigation, and a 15-day presidential review. Regulatory approvals in the People’s Republic of China : At the moment China is the biggest competitor of the California tech scene, but Chinese investors must jump through a lot of hoops to play in international markets. SAFE – The State Administration of foreign exchanges is in charge of all foreign exchange matters in China. Chinese purchasers must register all outbound investments to convert RMB to foreign currency and make outbound transactions and remit foreign currency. This registration is dealt with after dealing with MOFCOM and NDRC. MOFCOM – China’s Ministry of Commerce of their local offices must approve foreign investors for certain industries such as telecommunications, media, education, theme parks, and a few others. NDRC – The National Development and Reform Commission must approve all outbound investments of more than US$300 million from China. This approval can easily be gained with merely a formal filing, as long as it does not involve sensitive countries or industries. Other regulatory approvals : As we already mentioned, each country can require different regulatory approvals for foreign investors, so it is essential to analyze from the start whether or not the transaction can be consummated under said country’s legislation for the target industry. It is very common for multinational companies to close certain countries separately. For example, transactions in India often delay worldwide transactions and are often signed separately. This can also happen in France, where employee consultation requirements call for binding offers, specifically created for the French subsidiaries. Read More : Things To Do In Israel That You Must Know Finding The Right Moving Company

READ MOREDetails
Youtube's Ad Sales For Q3 Fy23 Surged By 12.5%

Youtube’s Ad Sales For Q3 Fy23 Surged By 12.5%, Reaching Nearly $8 Billion

All those pesky YouTube Ads are turning out to be a boon for YouTube. For the end of the quarter on September 30, 2023, tech giant Alphabet, the parent company of Google, reported a total ad revenue of $59.6 billion. The ad revenue touched $44 billion, which was brought in by Google’s search business, which marked a hike of 11.3 %. YouTube has generated $7.95 billion in ad revenue for Q3 2023. It has been a 12.5% increase from the previous year. The corporation has credited the positive outcome to brand and direct-response advertising. The total ad revenue for the company has grown by 9.5%. The ad revenue in the previous year had been a far lesser number- a mere 1.9% since 2021. At an investor call, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, reported that daily views for the short-form video platform have increased significantly. YouTube Shorts has increased in views to 70 billion per day. It was 50 billion earlier this year. He even added that the company is planning to introduce enhancements for Shorts, including AI-powered editing tools along with other features. In his statement, he said, “I’m pleased with our financial results and our product momentum this quarter, with AI-driven innovations across Search, YouTube, Cloud, our Pixel devices and more. We’re continuing to focus on making AI more helpful for everyone; there’s exciting progress and lots more to come." Google has registered a total profit of $19.7 billion for the third quarter of 2023. It marks a 46% increase from that of Q3 of 2022. The company’s total revenue has reached $76.7 billion (11%). Google’s cloud computing services, Google Cloud, have also seen an increase in profit margins due to increased business in AI training tools. It marked a growth of 22% year over year in revenue. Interestingly, Google Cloud’s performance in Q3 revenue of $8.41 billion fell short of investor expectations. It missed the planned  $8.64 billion. Alphabet is even facing an antitrust trial, where it has been alleged of monopolistic practices in search dominance. This has led to Alphabet’s shares declining over 6% in after-hours trading, despite YouTube’s otherwise strong performance. Read Also: Whatsapp Drops Support For Android KitKat: Latest Updates WhatsApp Is Testing Pinning Feature With Specific Timeframe Manish Rawat's Zinmatt Is Making Learning Free And Accessible

READ MOREDetails