Evolution of the U.S. Patent System

Published on: 10 January 2019 Last Updated on: 08 August 2019
Patent

Patents have actually existed since the 1300s when an inventor was granted a right to a monopoly. While the specifics of the grants, the complexity of the issuing process, and the number of patents that exist have greatly expanded, the principle idea of the right has not changed significantly. However, we now have a robust industry of patent attorneys like Tampa’s The Patent Professor, a profession you probably wouldn’t have stumbled across in the Medieval times. Read more below about the evolution of the United States patent system to what we know it to be today:

The Colonial Period:

In the Colonies, there was no set patent process or a centralized patent office, since each colony operated essentially as a completely individual territory under the British monarchy. However, each colony issued “patents” on a case-by-case basis, with the first being issued to Samuel Winslow by the Governor of Massachusetts in 1641. Winslow was granted a 10-year monopoly on a particular method of harvesting salt.

Adoption of the US Constitution:

In Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, there is a provision that specifically addresses the protection of intellectual property. This was the first official mention of a patent in US documentation and signaled that the United States would support innovation with legal tools that allowed term-limited “monopolies” on registered inventions.

The Patent Acts:

1790:

3 years after the adoption of the US Constitution by the newly formed United States, the Patent Act of 1790 was passed. It gave limited protections, a short, 14-year term for protection, and was found to be fairly unsatisfactory to most concerned citizens of the new country. It would only last a few years before being replaced.

1793:

In 1793, the modern definition of a patent was introduced, and the application process was simplified. This Patent Act stood for over 50 years and granted over 10,000 patents before being updated once more.

1836:

In 1836, a new Act was passed that formally established the United States Patent Office, whereas previous patent applicants had to appeal directly to the Secretary of State (and in the first Patent Act, to the Attorney General and Secretary of War as well). In addition, it created a database of all existing patents, available in public libraries, so that people could research before submitting their application to ensure that it was a truly original idea. Finally, it created the option for patent holders to extend from 14 to 21 years in some cases.

Depression and Anti-Patent Sentiments:

In the 1890 Depression, and again during the Great Depression, US citizens held an exceptionally negative attitude towards patents, and these sentiments led to the establishment of antitrust laws. These laws created limitations on the monopolies that major corporations were able to form and gave power back to the smaller players of the industry.

The Modern United States Patent and Trademark Office:

The Patent Act of 1952 created the current patent system as we know it today. It added additional stipulations for the final approval of a patent, such as ways that it could be infringed, explaining how it is useful and non-obvious, and other details that are still present in the application process to the USPTO.

Patent law is constantly evolving, and as more patents and new technologies develop, you can be certain that they will continue to evolve, even more rapidly as the rate of innovation increases.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

OpenAI Hires Back Sam Altman, The Previous CEO After Employees Rebels

OpenAI Hires Back Sam Altman, The Previous CEO After Employees Rebels

Sam Altman, the previous CEO of OpenAI, returns after he was overthrown from the company by the last board members, including D’Angelo. Even though there was no specific information given as to why Altman was fired from the company, he is being hired back. The decision taken by the board of directors of OpenAI last Friday shocked the Artificial Intelligence industry, especially because it was Altman who was the face and one of the company's co-founders. The startup organization, OpenAI, faced internal conflict as another co-founder, Greg Brockman, resigned as the president. Furthermore, a board member and fellow co-founder of OpenAI posted on X about how he deeply regretted his decision to fire Sam Altman from his position as CEO. The post on the social media platform seemed like a mending of the bridge and trying to bring him back to the company. With all these developments among the senior management, the 770 startup employees also brazenly signed a letter. In the letter, the employees called for the previous CEO Altman's return and the previous board's resignation. On the other hand, Microsoft’s approach to hiring Altman might not be happening anymore after this development. The CEO Satya Nadella at Microsoft announced on Monday on X about the joining of Altman and Brockman to a new advanced team. Considering Microsoft is one of the largest investors of OpenAI, they believe that Altman will be working for them under any condition. He also confirmed that he is open to Altman going back to OpenAI as long as the board's problems at OpenAI are resolved along with the smooth governance of the organization. Initially, OpenAI was co-founded by Altman to benefit humanity by creating smarter content; however, it later became a profitable business. He also shouted out to the employees at OpenAI regarding their petition in support of Altman. Further, the CEO offered jobs that matched the current job profile and responsibilities of all employees at OpenAI. Learn More About: Is AI Changing The Insurance Sector? The Brains Behind ChatGPT: Who’s Pulling the Strings?

READ MOREDetails
Children Go Missing

How Many Children Go Missing in the US Every Year?

For parents, nothing is more important than the safety and security of their children. They do everything they can to provide their children with the best life possible. Therefore, it can be incredibly stressful when a child goes missing. Even though parents may lose track of their child in a grocery store, may not know exactly where they are when they go to hang out with friends, and might even let teenagers go out on their own, most parents still have a general idea of where their children are located and what they are doing. When parents truly have no idea where their child is located, this can be overwhelming. Fortunately, missing children in the United States almost always make it home alive. Most Children Make It Home Alive The reality is this: more than 99 percent of children who go missing eventually come home alive. Thanks to technological advances in the way searches are conducted, and much greater awareness when it comes to quick action, the overwhelming majority of children who go missing are eventually recovered. In 1990, just 62 percent of children who went missing were recovered alive. In 2011, that rate had risen to 97 percent. Now, the rate is over 99 percent. This includes not only high-risk cases but also abductions by a stranger or family member who might be wanted on an arrest warrant. This rapid increase in successful recoveries has served as solace to the countless parents who deal with missing children every year. So, how many childrehn go missing every year in the United States. Every year, approximately 800,000 children are reported missing. This includes children who might be injured, lost, run away from home and those who are abducted. Out of the children who are abducted, approximately 200,000 are taken by family members. Usually, this takes place during a custody battle. Approximately 58,000 children who go missing involve non-members. These are usually people who are familiar with the child but have targeted that child for one reason or another. This could include someone who befriends the child over a long amount of time, a next-door neighbor, or even a friend of some sort. Even if the abduction is performed by a stranger, this usually is perpetrated by someone who has studied the child for an extended amount of time. They understand where the child goes, how the child behaves, and how the child responds to certain situations. If they are able to learn the schedule of the child, they can increase their chances of successfully abducting the child. In many cases, a child abduction is more an act of seduction than abduction. The child usually goes willingly with the adult in an effort to avoid drawing attention to the scene. That is why it is important for parents to think carefully about who their child to spending time with. That way, they can reduce their chances of their child being groomed and abducted by someone. How To React When a Child Goes Missing And parents realized that their child has gone missing, this can be an incredibly stressful experience. The first thing those parents want to do is to hit the streets and start looking for their children. After all, they know their child, that knows how their child behaves, and they know where their child might go. Even though this is a normal got response, it is always better to work with a professional law enforcement agency. A professional agency has the tools and training necessary to recover children as quickly as possible. Parents who need help networking with law enforcement agencies, particularly in the event of international parental kidnapping, to take a look at the resources that are available from The Committee for Missing Children. That way, parents understand that this is not something they have to go through on their own. The most important thing parents have to remember is that they need to listen to the law enforcement professionals. For example, law enforcement professionals are going to do a lot of things at once because they have the manpower to do exactly that. Law enforcement professionals are going to use technology to take a look at who the child might have been interacting with online. Parents do not know everything their children do on the internet. Take me to look at their internet history can be a great place to get started. It is also important to get as many pictures out there as quickly as possible. When people have some idea of what the child looks like, they can keep their eyes open as well. For example, pictures might be placed on shopping bags, toll booths, billboards, and even in some of the major shopping buildings. The more people who see the picture, the better. Law enforcement professionals have the manpower to get pictures up as quickly as possible. This will get people looking for the child, increasing the chance of the child being recovered alive. Ultimately, the most important reason my parents need to rely on law enforcement professionals is that time is of the essence. The numbers show that the percentage chance of successfully recovering a missing child drops with every hour that goes by. Therefore, it is important to cast a net as quickly as possible to prevent the child from getting away from the immediate geographical area. Law enforcement professionals understand how to blitz the streets quickly in order to find a missing child. That is why parents should reach out to law enforcement professionals as quickly as possible when they realize that their child has gone missing. This will maximize their chances of recovering their child. Read Also: Should You Send Your Child with Autism to a Regular Summer Camp? Style Your Child: How to Find Comfy and Cute Clothing for Kids

READ MOREDetails
Fake Health News

7 Shocking Causes of Fake Health News & Their Consequences 

The term “Fake News” has existed since the 1800s but has resurged in the last decade.   Often, one political side uses it as a defense mechanism against negative articles. The result is societal confusion over what’s true and what’s not.  When health news becomes unreliable, the consequences are more severe. This trend, fueled by political partisanship, has become increasingly dangerous.   Generally, mainstream media like television and print journalism maintain enough integrity to avoid spreading fake health news. However, in the social media landscape, fake stories spread rapidly with a simple click. The Causes The primary cause of fake health news is profit. More shares and likes equal more advertising opportunities. The healthcare industry, especially pharma, spends heavily on advertising.   With every click generating potential revenue, it’s no surprise that some lesser “news” services embellish or even lie to grow their following.  For example, a fake article on “Natural News” claimed the cancer industry was a scam for profit. It received 5.4 million hits, and the site’s Facebook page gained over 3 million followers.   Popularity pays!  In social media monetization, influencers can earn about $10 per 1,000 followers for sponsored content.   Once they hit 1 million followers, they can make up to $1,000 per post solely through advertising.  The Consequences As social media continues to expand, the potential for spreading fake news also grows. The issue needs attention because the consequences can be real and even fatal.   Some stories don’t cause direct harm, such as one claiming ginger is a better cancer treatment than chemotherapy. Still, they mislead people away from proper care.  For patients with terminal illnesses, hope is everything. False stories, like one about a diabetes cure in Mexico, can give false hope to those desperate for solutions. The most harmful fake news encourages the use of FDA-unapproved products.   Although these stories often remain on social media, even the U.S. president once promoted a chemical as a COVID-19 cure.   Clinical trials showed that the chemical increased heart attack risks and was not safe for such use. The Cure Given social media’s global reach, the best way to combat fake news is through education.  Teaching about its dangers can prevent this from becoming a generational issue, unlike other falsehoods rooted in fear.   Currently, many prominent social media platforms flag posts containing false or misleading information.  People believe in fake news because it aligns with their existing beliefs. This makes government regulation challenging, especially as new social media platforms arise, vowing not to flag any content. Again, this approach is money-driven. How to Check Whether a Health News Over Social Media is Fake  With the deluge of health news filling up your Facebook feed, it’s important to know how to spot real from fake.   Sure, fake news can be damn convincing these days — but there are a few good tricks of the trade to protect yourself.  Check the Source First and foremost, always check the source. Is the article coming from a reputable organization or a well-known health authority?   Credible sources include government health agencies, recognized research institutions and trusted news outlets.   If the source is obscure or lacks a professional presence, be cautious. A questionable source can be a red flag even if the information seems convincing.  Reference Studies Legitimate health news should reference studies, expert opinions, or credible data. If the article cites scientific research, look for links to peer-reviewed journals or established medical websites.   Beware of articles that make sensational claims without backing them up with evidence. Even when there’s a study mentioned, ensure it’s recent, relevant, and conducted by recognized experts in the field.  Watch for Emotional Triggers Fake health news often relies on emotional triggers to generate clicks.   If a post uses language like “miracle cure” or “secret the government doesn’t want you to know,” it appeals to your emotions rather than your intellect.   Real health information is rational, calm, and devoid of sensationalism.  Compare against other Reliable Sources If you’re not sure if a piece of information is accurate, see if other reliable sources report similar news.   In fact, if the news article is true, it will likely be reported by more legitimate organizations or outlets as well.   If you only find that news on questionable sites or personal blogs, it’s better to ignore them.  Check the Writer’s Background Who wrote the article? Is it a doctor, a journalist with a strong history of health reporting, or an expert in the field?   If you can’t tell, don’t know what the writer has for credentials, or don’t tie closely to health, their information may be iffy.  Watch out for Biased (and sponsored) Content Sometimes, content is created to sell something, whether it’s a product or an idea. Sponsored articles, particularly those highlighting supplements or treatments, are usually biased.   Check for disclaimers and consider whether the article is more about making money than offering accurate health information.  Publication Date Health guidelines and research are constantly evolving. An article that’s a few years old may not be accurate or relevant anymore.   Be sure to check when it was published to get the most current information.  Use Fact-Checking Websites Lastly, consult fact-checking websites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, or Health Feedback to fact-check a suspicious claim.   These platforms research and investigate viral stories and can usually verify whether something is true or not. Read Also: How to Keep up on the Latest News How Cutting Edge Technology is Helping Dubai Improve its Healthcare Services Health Tips For Managing High Cholesterol

READ MOREDetails