Organizations provide a platform of power to personalities. They provide several possibilities. From a strictly economic context, they exist to generate income surpluses, by satisfying the needs of the market. But they are also political structures that provide scenarios for individuals to grow their careers. Therefore, they provide options for the communication of personal interests and motivations.
The growth of careers, principally at the topmost levels, is dependent on the accretion of authority as a factor to transform distinct benefits into activities that influence others. One person that fits that sentiment is Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev.
The shortage of authority arises under the following framework:
- When individuals achieve total authority at the expense of other people.
- When it succeeds as a result of an evolutionary process of power distribution.
- In both cases, the make-up of shortage and comparison is applied. You can compare yourself to others and think about total loss of authority or the change in the equal part you had reflects a reduction in your source of power. You can also compare your relationship with others or with your personal goal and experience a loss.
- The shortage of positions in the high levels of the companies generally comes from the pyramidal structure. The ultimate goal should always be to promote the most capable people to the highest positions and grant them the salary according to their potential.
- In addition to the conditions of insufficiency and rivalry, politics in companies is presented by the survival of groups of voters.
Power and politics:
Another additional factor that enhances the struggle for the inherent power of any political structure is the constant effort to use any kind of force one possesses. Businesses have a traditional system: “the original capitalization” that forms the source of an individual’s power. It has three elements: a) the formal authority that has its position concerning the others; b) the professional body based on its efficiency, track-record and background of its competence; and c) the personality attraction
The quest for power in politics is dictated by many factors. The idea of being an all-powerful representative of the people is a matter of huge personal growth. Sometimes it also involves doing service to the nation or the country.
How one uses power is also a central point of debate. The individual has to act and obtain results. If no one can do one or the other, he diminishes his source of energy in direct percentage to the previous doubts that others had about him in earlier evaluations of his personality.
Personality-driven political leaders have had an aura and charisma about them. Some of the greatest leaders have had charismatic personalities. These individuals were able to draw massive crowds just because of their infectious and powerful personalities.
However, one needs to make a distinction between what individuals do for subordination, and what they do whole-heartedly.
A generalized error among executives is to complicate obedience with commitment. The agreement is an approach of approval when an order, given by a person with authority, includes a modification in the role, actions or thoughts of an individual.
The commitment characterizes a sturdy inspiration by the individual to accept or refuse the order. If the person commits to an alteration, then he will employ his cleverness to implement and interpret the difference in a novel way that his success can be assured.
If someone obeys you, that should not be mistaken for a person’s commitment. Obedience is very different from dedicated service. This problem is a routine problem when public servants are involved.