Tips for Winning Your DUI Car Accident Case

Published on: 03 December 2019 Last Updated on: 25 November 2020
DUI Car Accident Case

Drunk driving is one of the leading causes of car accidents, especially in Dallas, Texas, where 46% of drivers are highly likely to be involved in an accident, as reported by Allstate Insurance Co. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), as many as 10,000 people die as a result of intoxicated drivers. Surviving victims often suffer from severe and debilitating injuries. When this happens, victims can receive compensation. Here is how they can get the best compensation following a DWI accident.

Tips for Winning Your DUI Car Accident Case:

Call the Police:

Call the Police

Immediately after the accident, call the police if you can. When the police are on the scene, you can have the assurance that the incident is recorded. This record is crucial when you need to file an insurance claim or prepare a lawsuit against a drunk driver. Failing to contact the police can weaken your case and only put the negligent driver back behind the wheel again.

You also need to understand that this might be something, where a Traffic Lawyer Kansas City can prove to be a real asset. By working with the law enforcement agencies, collecting information about the incident, and doing other things, the best traffic lawyers build a favorable case in your favor.

Collect All Necessary Information:

When you can, gather all the information you can get, such as the driver’s name and contact details, the license plate of the vehicle, date and time of the accident, and persons involved. It will also help your case if you can talk with potential eyewitnesses and get records of dashcam footage. If you find it challenging to converse with the drunk driver, don’t forget to collect all this information from the police. Don’t forget to get the name of the responding police officers, so it is easy to make follow-ups regarding the case. Never leave the location of the incident until you get all the data you need.

Get Medical Help:

Medical Help

No matter how small your injury is, get emergency medical help, as this will also serve as your evidence of harm should you need to file a claim. It is crucial to get a thorough physical exam as sometimes injuries are not obvious during the first few hours of the accident. Don’t forget to get the name of the attending doctor, so it is easy to get statements later on.

Be Cautious of Early Settlement Offers:

In most cases, DWI victims often receive a call from the insurance company representing the driver in an effort to settle with you. They do this so they can pay you off and stop you from getting more money from them. Never ever settle without the medical report. Always consider present and future expenses when negotiating a settlement. As much as possible, do not agree to an initial settlement.

Keep Records of Your Treatments:

Most DWI victims do not know that they can get compensation for all their medical expenses. If you want the insurance company to compensate you adequately, keep all records of your treatments, medications, and procedures.

Prepare for a Lawsuit:

While you are working on having adequate compensation for your injuries, you must also seriously consider your legal rights. Often, insurance companies will pressure you to settle right away. Contact Dallas DWI attorneys to help you explore your legal options. When looking for an attorney to represent you, always ask these questions:

  • The attorney’s experience with DWI cases
  • The date of their last trial and the verdict

It is important to get someone who can represent you well and who will not buckle against the pressure of a defense lawyer. Make sure to ask about whether the lawyer works based on contingency fees, especially if you are cash-strapped at the moment.

Final Thoughts:

Suffering from debilitating injuries is life-changing. Often, victims choose to go into a trial, not because of the compensation they can get but because they don’t want to let the drunk driver roam free and cause accidents in the future.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

food critic

When Restaurants Fight Back: A Diner’s Failed Attempt to Sue a Food Critic for Defamation

Restaurant reviews can make or break your business. A positive review of your restaurant can keep your cash counter busy and tables filled with loud and happy customers. But, a negative review does the complete opposite, leaving hardly any cash to collect and fewer tables to clean.  Food critics hold power, and restaurants know it. Some establishments accept criticism and learn from it. Others take a more aggressive approach that can backfire badly. This is what happened to a well-known diner when they decided to fight back against a food critic. The results were not what they expected. The Case of Il Giardino A Vancouver-based Italian restaurant, Il Giardino, was a local favorite. It’s known for its classic pasta dishes and cozy atmosphere. But in 2011, the restaurant’s reputation was challenged. The trouble began when a respected food critic, Colin Thomas, wrote a review that painted the restaurant in a negative light. He described the food as bland, overpriced, and lacking the warmth it once had. The owners of Il Giardino were furious. They felt that Thomas’ words were not just harsh but unfair and damaging. They believed his review crossed the line and hurt their business. So, they decided to take legal action and sue him for defamation. The Lawsuit That Backfired This lawsuit was something new and big news indeed. It’s not every day that you get to see a restaurant sue a critic. Many people were curious about how it would turn out. The owners argued that the review was defamatory and claimed it had caused them to lose customers and money. But fighting a food critic in court is tricky. Critics are protected under free speech laws. The court decided that Thomas’ review was an opinion, not a statement of fact. It didn’t meet the standard for defamation. The case was dismissed. Instead of fixing their problem, Il Giardino made it worse. The lawsuit brought more attention to the bad review. News outlets covered the story, and people talked about it on social media. What might have been forgotten in a week was now in the spotlight for months. The restaurant's online reputation suffered more than it did from the original review. Why Suing Critics Is Risky When a restaurant fights back, it backfires on them. And it’s not really a smart move to sue a food critic. Here’s why – 1. Freedom of Speech Critics have the right to share their opinions. If a review is based on an experience and doesn’t include false claims, it is protected as free speech. Courts are careful about setting a precedent that could limit this freedom. 2. The Streisand Effect Trying to silence a critic can lead to more attention. This is known as the Streisand Effect, named after Barbra Streisand, who tried to hide photos of her home but ended up drawing more attention to them. The same happened to Il Giardino. Their attempt to stop the review only made it more popular. 3. Public Backlash People don’t like it when businesses try to suppress opinions. It can make a restaurant look like it can’t handle criticism or is trying to bully a writer. This can lead to backlash and damage a brand’s reputation. Lessons Learned from the McDonald’s Case Even major brands like McDonald’s have faced backlash for going after critics. In 1990, McDonald’s sued two environmental activists in the UK for distributing pamphlets that accused the company of poor practices. The case became known as the "McLibel" trial and lasted ten years. The outcome? A PR disaster for McDonald’s. The activists couldn’t pay damages, but they won public support. McDonald’s spent millions on legal fees and looked like the villain. The company’s reputation took a hit, showing that even large corporations can face consequences when they overreact to criticism. How to Handle Criticism as a Restaurant? It’s not uncommon these days for a brand to get backlash from critics or customers. But how they handle it makes all the difference. Some of the tactics below work really well to handle criticism: 1. Respond Calmly and Professionally A calm response can go a long way. Thank the critic for their feedback and mention any changes you plan to make. This shows that the restaurant values customer opinions and is willing to improve. 2. Focus on Positive Reviews A bad review hurts, but it doesn’t define a restaurant. Focus on encouraging happy customers to leave positive reviews. A mix of reviews shows that a restaurant is real and popular. According to BrightLocal, 87% of consumers read online reviews for local businesses. A few negative reviews won’t hurt as much if there are plenty of positive ones. 3. Improve Feedback Sometimes, criticism has truth in it. Look at what the critic pointed out and see if there are ways to improve. This can help turn a negative into a positive. It shows customers that the restaurant listens and evolves. 4. Invest in Online Reputation Management If a bad review is causing ongoing issues, using an online reputation management service can help. These services can guide a restaurant on how to boost its online image and deal with negative press. Recommendations for Restaurant Owners Before your business has to handle something as harsh, it’s better to build some ground rules that keep your business away from such events.  Think Before Reacting It’s natural to feel upset after reading a harsh review, but it’s important to think before acting. Responding to anger or taking legal action can lead to bigger problems. Provide Exceptional Customer Service The foundation for a good business reputation starts with a business capability of delivering class-A customer service. So, start by training your team. Warm and attentive staff attract more customers and build a good impression about your restaurant among clients. With open communication, your staff will take the business extra mile and exceed customer expectations.  Communicate with Your Team Make sure your team knows how to handle criticism. Training staff to respond professionally and with empathy can keep the restaurant’s image strong. Don’t Compromise in the Food Quality If the raw materials start to cost more, your customers may understand if the price goes high by a little. But, lowering food quality to adjust food prices can do damage to your restaurant in the long run. Always use fresh and high-quality ingredients to make food. Consistency in the quality of your food is the key to how you will succeed. Stay Engaged with Customers Interact with customers on review sites and social media. Show that you care about their experiences, good or bad. This connection can build loyalty and encourage repeat visits. The Takeaway Il Giardino’s attempt to sue a food critic for defamation is a reminder that fighting criticism can often make things worse. Publicly challenging a review can lead to more attention, public backlash, and damage to a business’s reputation. Instead, restaurants should focus on learning from criticism and responding professionally. Encouraging positive feedback and engaging with customers can help maintain a strong image. And when extra help is needed, an online reputation management service can provide the right support. In the end, handling criticism with grace and using it as a tool for improvement will benefit a restaurant far more than a court case ever could. Read Also: Navigating The Maze Of Compensation Claims: Everything You Need To Know When Do You Need A Personal Injury Lawyer: A Guide For Accident Victims Do I Need A Lawyer For Probation Violations?

READ MOREDetails
injury

What To Do If You Have Suffered An Injury That Is Not Your Fault?

Every year, millions of people get an injury in accidents that have been caused by others. Often, they suffer serious injuries. In some cases, they end up being permanently disabled. If this happens to you, it is important to react to the situation in the right way. Doing so will have a significant impact on how easy and how quickly you can get your life back on track. This basic checklist will help you to handle this situation in the best possible way. What To Do If You Have Suffered An Injury That Is Not Your Fault? Get yourself a lawyer If you have been injured, there is a good chance that finding a lawyer is the last thing on your mind. Your focus is on getting better. This is understandable, but you really should make hiring a personal injury lawyer a priority. Should you not do so, your chances of winning compensation are considerably reduced. It is all too easy for vital evidence to be lost or cleared away. You may also inadvertently do things that will end up weakening your case. Make sure you do not admit blame When you hire a lawyer at an early stage, they will explain to you what information you need to gather. They will also help you to avoid saying things that make it sound like you were somehow to blame for the accident and, therefore, your injuries. Keep a record of your injuries and recovery Usually, they will ask you to keep a diary of your symptoms, the drugs you are taking and your treatments. As well as keep a record of the impact the injury is having on your life and the additional expenses you have. They may also ask you to use a pain app like the ones you can download via the links on this page. Follow the medical advice you are given Following the advice your doctors give you sounds obvious. But, it can be difficult to do when you are feeling so ill. For example, taking a daily walk when you are in a lot of pain will not be easy. But, despite this, you must do the very best you can to follow the instructions you are given. Doing so will help you to heal faster and will reduce the risk of the other party being able to use the argument that you did not recover from your injuries because you did not follow medical advice. The last thing you want is to inadvertently let the person who is ultimately responsible for your injuries off the hook. Accept the help of others When we get hurt we are usually at our most vulnerable. Yet despite this, when offered help, many of us automatically say no thank you. Our pride just won’t let us accept the assistance that we really need. It is important to be aware of this tendency and to resist automatically saying no when help is offered. You need to get better as soon as possible. With the assistance of others, you will be able to do that. Read Also: 6 Important Questions to Ask a Personal Injury Lawyer Atlanta Law Experts: Know about Back Injuries Compensation

READ MOREDetails
Civil Cases Versus Criminal Cases

Civil Cases Versus Criminal Cases: What You Need To Know

If you have been following the news lately, you must be aware that many misconceptions have revolved around criminal and civil cases. Since you have clicked on the link to this article, I will presume that you are someone who likes to keep a keen interest in law.  As responsible citizens, we must know all the specificities of the law. It will help us be aware, and it will save us in times of trouble.   I am a defense lawyer myself, and I have been enjoying my job for the last ten years. I believe the Federal court in Missouri has some of the best lawyers in the entire U.S.  So, without further ado, let us look at the major differences between Civil Cases and Criminal Cases  What Is A Civil Case? Civil cases are those where an individual has private disputes. They are not harmful to society.  Civil offenses are lawsuits for crimes against the State or jurisdiction.  Since both civil and criminal cases are offenses, there are bound to be some similarities as well as differences. As law-abiding citizens, we must ensure we know everything there is to know.  When it comes to civil cases, there are two parties, one of which disputes the case. Legally, you would call them the ‘plaintiff’ and the other party against whom one would make the charges. They are the ‘defendant.’  The plaintiff may approach the court to ensure that the defendant has fulfilled its duty or ask the court for compensation for the damage done.  Both the Federal Court and State Court entertain civil cases.   For instance, if a computer shop owner signs a contract with a customer and agrees to deliver the computers at a specific price, and later, if the computer shop owner fails to deliver the computers, it can force the customer to buy the products from some other computer shop at a higher rate.  Then the customer has every right to sue the computer shop owner for the extra cost that he had to bear to purchase the computers from some other place.   If the parties belonged to completely different states, then the case would go to a federal court like Federal Courthouse Springfield, MO. What Is A Criminal Case? Criminal cases are those which often include an individual committing a crime, which may range from minor misdemeanors to murder in the first degree.  The government, taking the side of its citizens, prosecutes the individual via the Attorney’s Office of the United States if the individual has been charged with the federal level’s crimes. The District Attorney’s Office, also known as the D.A., deals with state crimes.  According to America’s law, it is not for the victim to bring to produce a criminal case in the courthouse.   For instance, if a person is kidnapped, the government can press charges on the individual regardless of whether the victim wants it.  For instance, the state government has the power to prosecute people who are involved in drunk driving as it poses a threat not just to a single individual but to many people.   This is quite unlike the cases entertained at Federal Courthouse Springfield, MO. What Are the Similarities Between Civil Cases versus Criminal Cases? Both these cases have a few things in common.  Usually, both civil and criminal cases involve private parties.  A person can be charged with both civil and criminal cases at the same time.  What are the key differences between a civil case and a criminal case? There are a ton of differences that you should know about. Keep reading  The grounds for acquiring proof are different in both civil and criminal cases.  The patient has been taking medications as prescribed.  All defendants in criminal cases have the right to an attorney  Criminal and civil cases vary greatly in terms of punishment.  Choosing Your Path as a New Lawyer: Civil or Criminal Law?  Deciding between civil and criminal law if you’re a new lawyer is more difficult than ever.   Both paths offer distinct experiences, professional development opportunities, and rewards. Here’s what to consider before making your decision. 1. Passion and Interest The first step in the process is to figure out which areas of law you are most interested in.   Do you like strategic negotiations with contracts and settlements?   Perhaps criminal trials are more your style. Generally, civil law deals with private disputes between individuals, such as families or businesses, whereas criminal law focuses on people accused of a crime. Pick an area that interests you the most. 2. Work Environment and Style Civil law typically has a more structured work schedule compared to criminal law.  If you practice civil law, you may work during regular business hours and manage a large docket of paperwork. Other work might include drafting contracts or settling other types of disputes.   Criminal law can be highly unpredictable.   Court appearances are the norm rather than the exception, and competing deadlines, such as bail hearings or plea negotiations, sometimes trigger intense pressure. You might have to prepare yourself for such pressure.  If you are most comfortable in public speaking situations, then apply for an advocacy role within your society. You can also find opportunities for mock trial competitions. 3. Impact and Client Interaction In civil law, you’re representing a business or individual in a financial or contractual dispute.   Your impact is usually limited to the parties themselves.   In criminal law however, you’re potentially defending someone’s freedom (or, in some cases, helping punish them for a crime in a lawful way), which can be quite emotionally satisfying. However, criminal law is not for the weak.  You need to grow resilience against hearing some of the most gruesome things mankind does. So, ensure that you are well prepared to hold yourself together.  Consider the degree of client interaction and overall societal impact you want from your practice. 4. Long-Term Goals First, consider your long-term career goals. What is the reason behind you choosing law as a field to pursue?  Civil law is the best choice if you want to work in niche practice areas such as family law, corporate law, or intellectual property.   On the other hand, criminal law is the way to go if you hope to rise through the ranks of a public defender’s office or become a District Attorney (DA).  Ultimately, pick the lane that most resonates with your passion, work style, and career ambitions.  Final Thoughts The life of a lawyer is uncertain, and we never know what might be thrown at us.   Hence, it is important to keep yourselves updated and have a trustworthy lawyer who can be by your side when needed.   Be it for a new lawyer to select the desired path or for a commoner wanting to know more about the law. Having an idea about both civil and criminal cases can come in handy.  Life can often be a handful; you never know what might happen next. That is why you always need to have proper contact with the best lawyer to guide you. Stay safe and well-informed. Read Also: How To Find The Right Criminal Defense Attorney For Your Next Case? What Do Criminal Defense Attorneys Do? How to Choose the Best Murfreesboro Criminal Defense Attorney A Civil Way of Separating: 6 Questions and Answers About Collaborative Divorce

READ MOREDetails