How Big Is The Problem Of Medical Malpractice In Miami?

Published on: 03 May 2021 Last Updated on: 02 January 2025
Problem Of Medical Malpractice In Miami

With exponentially growing medical malpractice cases, the time has come to take a serious view of the issue and take adequate steps to curb the problem.

A series of complicated statutes govern the medical malpractice cases in Tampa and are referred to as the Florida Medical Malpractice Act.

It comes under the ambit of Florida Statutes section 766. This statute has undergone several changes and edits over the years with changing times, and it is most favorable to hospitals and medical or health care providers.

The law is not very favorable towards malpractice victims. It takes highly experienced, expert, and skilled Miami medical malpractice attorneys to win a medical malpractice case.

How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit?

The medical malpractice law also comes with a statute of limitations of two years. It means that the case needs to be filed within two years of the incident to be admissible in court.

If the petition gets filed within the original limitation statute expiry, it can be extended to three months. Medical malpractice cases are usually very complex and need a lot of preparation to build a solid case.

The lawyer and the victim have to put in a lot of time, effort, and energy into collecting and gathering relevant medical reports. Once collected, these reports are closely scrutinized and analyzed to see if it has merit.

An expert witness who also reviews the records then prepares an affidavit attesting to the fact that the victim was subjected to harm and medical negligence by the health care provider. Once the affidavit is submitted in court, the malpractice case starts.

How can a Miami Medical Malpractice Attorney help you?

The task of the Miami Medical Malpractice attorney is to check the complicated regulations and laws that must be met before a medical malpractice case is filed in Miami.

It is imperative to note here that as per Miami’s medical malpractice laws, there is a mandatory pre-suit screening period wherein a set of oral and written questions is involved in the mandatory 90-day period before filing the lawsuit.

As soon as the victim or next of kin realizes having a medical malpractice case, they must immediately look for a qualified, experienced, expert, and skilled medical malpractice attorney who can handle their case and file in court.

Some facts about such cases are an eye-opener about growing problems in the medical field. As per the latest studies, as many as 440,000 people get killed every year due to medical errors that could have been prevented in the United States of America.

It is a staggering figure and shows the lacuna in the medical services. The figure shows deaths that could have been prevented if there would have been no careless medical errors.

The Bottom Line:

It is high time that authorities in position start taking cognizance of the fact and putting practices, procedures, and systems in place to help control and bring down this figure. Due to medical negligence, occupying the third position as the cause of death in America is removed. Strict and quick actions can do wonders with this problem and help patients get the best medical care.

Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

food critic

When Restaurants Fight Back: A Diner’s Failed Attempt to Sue a Food Critic for Defamation

Restaurant reviews can make or break your business. A positive review of your restaurant can keep your cash counter busy and tables filled with loud and happy customers. But, a negative review does the complete opposite, leaving hardly any cash to collect and fewer tables to clean.  Food critics hold power, and restaurants know it. Some establishments accept criticism and learn from it. Others take a more aggressive approach that can backfire badly. This is what happened to a well-known diner when they decided to fight back against a food critic. The results were not what they expected. The Case of Il Giardino A Vancouver-based Italian restaurant, Il Giardino, was a local favorite. It’s known for its classic pasta dishes and cozy atmosphere. But in 2011, the restaurant’s reputation was challenged. The trouble began when a respected food critic, Colin Thomas, wrote a review that painted the restaurant in a negative light. He described the food as bland, overpriced, and lacking the warmth it once had. The owners of Il Giardino were furious. They felt that Thomas’ words were not just harsh but unfair and damaging. They believed his review crossed the line and hurt their business. So, they decided to take legal action and sue him for defamation. The Lawsuit That Backfired This lawsuit was something new and big news indeed. It’s not every day that you get to see a restaurant sue a critic. Many people were curious about how it would turn out. The owners argued that the review was defamatory and claimed it had caused them to lose customers and money. But fighting a food critic in court is tricky. Critics are protected under free speech laws. The court decided that Thomas’ review was an opinion, not a statement of fact. It didn’t meet the standard for defamation. The case was dismissed. Instead of fixing their problem, Il Giardino made it worse. The lawsuit brought more attention to the bad review. News outlets covered the story, and people talked about it on social media. What might have been forgotten in a week was now in the spotlight for months. The restaurant's online reputation suffered more than it did from the original review. Why Suing Critics Is Risky When a restaurant fights back, it backfires on them. And it’s not really a smart move to sue a food critic. Here’s why – 1. Freedom of Speech Critics have the right to share their opinions. If a review is based on an experience and doesn’t include false claims, it is protected as free speech. Courts are careful about setting a precedent that could limit this freedom. 2. The Streisand Effect Trying to silence a critic can lead to more attention. This is known as the Streisand Effect, named after Barbra Streisand, who tried to hide photos of her home but ended up drawing more attention to them. The same happened to Il Giardino. Their attempt to stop the review only made it more popular. 3. Public Backlash People don’t like it when businesses try to suppress opinions. It can make a restaurant look like it can’t handle criticism or is trying to bully a writer. This can lead to backlash and damage a brand’s reputation. Lessons Learned from the McDonald’s Case Even major brands like McDonald’s have faced backlash for going after critics. In 1990, McDonald’s sued two environmental activists in the UK for distributing pamphlets that accused the company of poor practices. The case became known as the "McLibel" trial and lasted ten years. The outcome? A PR disaster for McDonald’s. The activists couldn’t pay damages, but they won public support. McDonald’s spent millions on legal fees and looked like the villain. The company’s reputation took a hit, showing that even large corporations can face consequences when they overreact to criticism. How to Handle Criticism as a Restaurant? It’s not uncommon these days for a brand to get backlash from critics or customers. But how they handle it makes all the difference. Some of the tactics below work really well to handle criticism: 1. Respond Calmly and Professionally A calm response can go a long way. Thank the critic for their feedback and mention any changes you plan to make. This shows that the restaurant values customer opinions and is willing to improve. 2. Focus on Positive Reviews A bad review hurts, but it doesn’t define a restaurant. Focus on encouraging happy customers to leave positive reviews. A mix of reviews shows that a restaurant is real and popular. According to BrightLocal, 87% of consumers read online reviews for local businesses. A few negative reviews won’t hurt as much if there are plenty of positive ones. 3. Improve Feedback Sometimes, criticism has truth in it. Look at what the critic pointed out and see if there are ways to improve. This can help turn a negative into a positive. It shows customers that the restaurant listens and evolves. 4. Invest in Online Reputation Management If a bad review is causing ongoing issues, using an online reputation management service can help. These services can guide a restaurant on how to boost its online image and deal with negative press. Recommendations for Restaurant Owners Before your business has to handle something as harsh, it’s better to build some ground rules that keep your business away from such events.  Think Before Reacting It’s natural to feel upset after reading a harsh review, but it’s important to think before acting. Responding to anger or taking legal action can lead to bigger problems. Provide Exceptional Customer Service The foundation for a good business reputation starts with a business capability of delivering class-A customer service. So, start by training your team. Warm and attentive staff attract more customers and build a good impression about your restaurant among clients. With open communication, your staff will take the business extra mile and exceed customer expectations.  Communicate with Your Team Make sure your team knows how to handle criticism. Training staff to respond professionally and with empathy can keep the restaurant’s image strong. Don’t Compromise in the Food Quality If the raw materials start to cost more, your customers may understand if the price goes high by a little. But, lowering food quality to adjust food prices can do damage to your restaurant in the long run. Always use fresh and high-quality ingredients to make food. Consistency in the quality of your food is the key to how you will succeed. Stay Engaged with Customers Interact with customers on review sites and social media. Show that you care about their experiences, good or bad. This connection can build loyalty and encourage repeat visits. The Takeaway Il Giardino’s attempt to sue a food critic for defamation is a reminder that fighting criticism can often make things worse. Publicly challenging a review can lead to more attention, public backlash, and damage to a business’s reputation. Instead, restaurants should focus on learning from criticism and responding professionally. Encouraging positive feedback and engaging with customers can help maintain a strong image. And when extra help is needed, an online reputation management service can provide the right support. In the end, handling criticism with grace and using it as a tool for improvement will benefit a restaurant far more than a court case ever could. Read Also: Navigating The Maze Of Compensation Claims: Everything You Need To Know When Do You Need A Personal Injury Lawyer: A Guide For Accident Victims Do I Need A Lawyer For Probation Violations?

READ MOREDetails
Fight For Your Inheritance In Case Of An Unfair Will

How To Fight For Your Inheritance In Case Of An Unfair Will

Suppose one person has two children. And both the children are expecting they will inherit an equal part of the property that their parents have. But the final testament will reveal that one of the two children gets the majority. At this point, the other child, who has got the minority party, may feel that the inheritance was unfair. The person can initiate a procedure to content the will. And in order to do so, anyone will need to consult with inheritance lawyers. How To Challenge? But one also needs to keep in mind that just because the person feels the will is unfair, he or she can not challenge a will. There are some strictly defined parameters set, as per that one can commence contesting a will. Let’s get an idea about those parameters. 1. The Will Lacks Validity: Under this very provision, one needs to establish a fact before the court of law. And the fact is, the deceased was in no condition or position of physically or mentally or both to understand and after that agree with the terms and conditions that are mentioned in the will. So, the deceased person was either coerced or tricked into making the offerings. 2. The Property Was Owned Jointly: In case the deceased person jointly owned the property, then the other party of the property will continue to enjoy the very ownership of the property as per the contract. And this is also making the other party eligible for challenging the will in case it grants ownership to someone else. 3. The Execution Of The Will Have Not Complied With The Law: This provision allows the appellant a chance to prove that the execution of the will did not follow the laws of the lands that lay down some specifics on the basis of how a will has to be witnessed and signed. And in order to do that, you will need a good inheritance lawyer in North Carolina. 4. The Will Is An Act Of Forgery: Here, an appellant has to prove in front of the court that the will was created fraudulently, or the sign of the deceased that is present on the will was crafted through forgery or also received under false pretense. Who Can Challenge? After we know the grounds on which one can challenge a will. The next question is Who can challenge the will in the court? In case you are one of the named beneficiaries in the will, you can challenge. And in order to do so, you need an inheritance lawyer in North Carolina. There is also another intestate succession law, which spells out inheritance rules in case there is no valid will. You also can challenge, if as per the law, you would inherit. So, this means that in case there are no surviving spouses or any direct descendants, even distant relatives can challenge a will. There is another condition when you might challenge the will. In case you are the beneficiary of the prior version of the will, that will become a valid one in case the court ruled the current version of the will invalid. In order to avoid such challenges, the copies of the prior version are destroyed most of the time. Alternatives That You Can Try: Before you challenge the will in the court, you can meet the executor and ask about the doubt you are having with the will. In case the person is able to make you understand it properly, then you may feel that you are not being cheated or need to go to court. Before you meet the executor, you can hire an inheritance attorney and consult along with all the legal papers and emails that you have sent to your family members and the executor. The person will assist you with them and also make sure you do not miss the deadline. Conclusion: With the help of a qualified inheritance lawyer in North Carolina, you can challenge a will in case you are fulfilling any of the mentioned conditions. The attorney will also let you know about some additional laws in case there are any. Read Also: 6 Reasons to Hire an Immigration Attorney (Not a Consultant) 5 Ways A Workers’ Compensation Attorney Can Help You In Your Case Hiring The Services Of A Legal Eagle

READ MOREDetails
Role Of Family Mediation In Legal Conflict Resolution

Understanding The Role Of Family Mediation In Legal Conflict Resolution

As much as we enjoy close and loving family relationships, sometimes, disputes find their way without warning. These disputes may include divorce and separation, succession issues, child maintenance, and custody. Handling these disputes is challenging and may need immediate action to resolve them. While some family disputes, especially those involving violence, may be resolved by court, some can be resolved by family mediation. Family mediation works on both parties’ interests and aims to restore a positive future relationship between the disputants. It is also a cheaper way of resolving family disputes and takes relatively less time. But what role does family mediation play in legal conflict resolution? Read through to understand all aspects of family mediation, including its process and benefits, as a peaceful way to solve family disputes. Understanding Mediation Role In Family Law Mediation is a dispute resolution process where the disputants cooperate with an independent third party to resolve their disputes outside court. Mediation is both a cheaper and faster way of resolving disputes among family members. Family mediation can help solve several issues. It can help resolve parenting disagreements, property settlements among divorcing couples, and succession disputes among kin. Note that mediation can occur with both parties sitting together or separately on different occasions. On disputes of significant magnitude, you can involve family lawyers to help guide the mediation process. If you don't resolve the dispute through family mediation, you may move to court. However, you must present a certificate to prove you engaged in family dispute resolution through mediation. The Purpose Of Family Mediation The purpose of family mediation is to help disputing parties reach a long-lasting agreement. The decision they arrive at should be of their liking and should be satisfactory to each party. Unlike other disputes, family disputes have a relationship and emotional attachments, though some have financial and legal implications. Resolving these disputes in court may address the financial and legal aspects alone and fail to address the emotional and relationship aspects. However, through mediation, the disputing family members can resolve all aspects of their disputes and arrive at a more desirable agreement. Family Mediation Process The family mediation process involves the following steps. 1.  Initial consultation/pre-mediation: The mediator seeks more information concerning the dispute. They should also gather personal concerns, perspectives, and projected outcomes of both parties. Note that at this stage, the mediator meets the disputants separately. 2. Joint sessions: After individual parties agree to proceed with mediation, the mediator organizes a joint session. At this stage, the mediator sits together with the disputing parties in one room. 3. Issues identification: Since the mediator has background information about the dispute at hand, they, at this stage, identify critical issues of the dispute. The mediator should guide both parties in talking about their priorities, concerns, and desires. 4. Establishing options: Now that the underlying issue is well-spelled out, the mediator should guide disputants in coming up with possible solutions. The mediator should suggest expansive possibilities after brainstorming suggested solutions. 5. Final agreement: At this stage, the mediator should assist the disputants in structuring a mutual agreement. The mediator should ensure that the final agreement is fair and in line with the state´s laws. Family Mediation Benefits Family mediation has several benefits, as listed below: It Generates Mutual Agreement Through family mediation, disputants can arrive at a mutual agreement satisfactory to each party. The parties have the right and power to explore all possibilities and arrive at a more desirable decision. Family Mediation Resolves Disputes Faster Unlike court disputes, which take years to resolve issues, family mediation takes a short period. On average, the family mediation process takes between three and six months to resolve a dispute. It Preserves Relationships Since family mediation addresses the emotional and relationship aspects of a dispute, the disputants should be able to maintain their long-term relationship post-dispute. Confidentiality And Privacy Court cases are in the public domain and may expose sensitive and private aspects to the general public. However, family mediation creates a more secure and private environment where disputes are resolved without involving the general public. Cost-Effective Mediation saves a lot of money, which would otherwise be spent on court charges and other legal fees. Family Disputes Ideal For Mediation The family disputes that should be resolved through mediation are as follows: ·         Succession disputes ·         Matrimonial property issues ·         Children maintenance disputes ·         Children custody ·         Shareholder disputes in the family business ·         Civil and other inter-personal disputes Should I Involve Family Lawyers In Family Mediation? It is good to involve your family lawyer in family mediation. The lawyer will provide you with legal advice concerning the legal and financial implications of your family dispute. Besides, they should be able to guide you through the mediation process since it can be overwhelming. In addition, they can help add the final touches to the final agreement you arrive at. Unfortunately, not all family mediation processes have the desired outcome. Sometimes, parties may disagree, bringing the need for court proceedings. In this case, the court will demand a certificate showing you participated in family mediation. Your lawyer will be much more resourceful here. Conclusion Family mediation aims to bring disputed family members to an agreement. Besides settling their disputes, it also helps mend their broken relationships and heal their emotions. In doing so, it protects the interests and values of both parties, promoting family cohesion. What's more, family meditation addresses the issues of parties involved in the mediation session and those indirectly involved in the dispute. The process will ensure the interest of such parties, including children´s future well-being, is well addressed. However, when your dispute involves violence or threat of life, don´t hesitate - file a court case immediately. Read Also: 30+ Fathers Day Gift Ideas: It’s More Than Gifts 8 Things Every Parent Should Do To Keep Kids Safe Online Top 10 Cybersecurity Features That Are A Must-Have In An Ecommerce Store

READ MOREDetails