7 Shocking Causes of Fake Health News & Their Consequences

Published on: 20 January 2021 Last Updated on: 10 September 2024

The term “Fake News” has existed since the 1800s but has resurged in the last decade. Often, one political side uses it as a defense mechanism against negative articles. The result is societal confusion over what’s true and what’s not. When health news becomes unreliable, the consequences are more severe. This trend, fueled by political partisanship, has become increasingly dangerous. Generally, mainstream media like television and print journalism maintain enough integrity to avoid spreading fake health news. However, in the social media landscape, fake stories spread rapidly with a simple click.

The Causes

The primary cause of fake health news is profit. More shares and likes equal more advertising opportunities. The healthcare industry, especially pharma, spends heavily on advertising. With every click generating potential revenue, it’s no surprise that some lesser “news” services embellish or even lie to grow their following. For example, a fake article on “Natural News” claimed the cancer industry was a scam for profit. It received 5.4 million hits, and the site’s Facebook page gained over 3 million followers. Popularity pays! In social media monetization, influencers can earn about $10 per 1,000 followers for sponsored content. Once they hit 1 million followers, they can make up to $1,000 per post solely through advertising.

The Consequences

As social media continues to expand, the potential for spreading fake news also grows. The issue needs attention because the consequences can be real and even fatal. Some stories don’t cause direct harm, such as one claiming ginger is a better cancer treatment than chemotherapy. Still, they mislead people away from proper care. For patients with terminal illnesses, hope is everything. False stories, like one about a diabetes cure in Mexico, can give false hope to those desperate for solutions. The most harmful fake news encourages the use of FDA-unapproved products. Although these stories often remain on social media, even the U.S. president once promoted a chemical as a COVID-19 cure. Clinical trials showed that the chemical increased heart attack risks and was not safe for such use.

The Cure

Given social media’s global reach, the best way to combat fake news is through education. Teaching about its dangers can prevent this from becoming a generational issue, unlike other falsehoods rooted in fear. Currently, many prominent social media platforms flag posts containing false or misleading information. People believe in fake news because it aligns with their existing beliefs. This makes government regulation challenging, especially as new social media platforms arise, vowing not to flag any content. Again, this approach is money-driven.

How to Check Whether a Health News Over Social Media is Fake

With the deluge of health news filling up your Facebook feed, it’s important to know how to spot real from fake. Sure, fake news can be damn convincing these days — but there are a few good tricks of the trade to protect yourself.

Check the Source

First and foremost, always check the source. Is the article coming from a reputable organization or a well-known health authority? Credible sources include government health agencies, recognized research institutions and trusted news outlets. If the source is obscure or lacks a professional presence, be cautious. A questionable source can be a red flag even if the information seems convincing.

Reference Studies

Legitimate health news should reference studies, expert opinions, or credible data. If the article cites scientific research, look for links to peer-reviewed journals or established medical websites. Beware of articles that make sensational claims without backing them up with evidence. Even when there’s a study mentioned, ensure it’s recent, relevant, and conducted by recognized experts in the field.

Watch for Emotional Triggers

Fake health news often relies on emotional triggers to generate clicks. If a post uses language like “miracle cure” or “secret the government doesn’t want you to know,” it appeals to your emotions rather than your intellect. Real health information is rational, calm, and devoid of sensationalism.

Compare against other Reliable Sources

If you’re not sure if a piece of information is accurate, see if other reliable sources report similar news. In fact, if the news article is true, it will likely be reported by more legitimate organizations or outlets as well. If you only find that news on questionable sites or personal blogs, it’s better to ignore them.

Check the Writer’s Background

Who wrote the article? Is it a doctor, a journalist with a strong history of health reporting, or an expert in the field? If you can’t tell, don’t know what the writer has for credentials, or don’t tie closely to health, their information may be iffy.

Watch out for Biased (and sponsored) Content

Sometimes, content is created to sell something, whether it’s a product or an idea. Sponsored articles, particularly those highlighting supplements or treatments, are usually biased. Check for disclaimers and consider whether the article is more about making money than offering accurate health information.

Publication Date

Health guidelines and research are constantly evolving. An article that’s a few years old may not be accurate or relevant anymore. Be sure to check when it was published to get the most current information.

Use Fact-Checking Websites

Lastly, consult fact-checking websites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, or Health Feedback to fact-check a suspicious claim. These platforms research and investigate viral stories and can usually verify whether something is true or not. Read Also:

Content Rally

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Meta Launching Free Subscription For Ad-Free Experience In Europe

Facebook and Instagram will be removing ads from their platforms and are introducing a paid subscription for users to avail of the feature. The service is available all over the European Union. It will be offered for roughly €9.99 per month on the web or €12.99 / month on iOS and Android to account for additional fees. Meta issued in their statement, “To comply with evolving European regulations, we are introducing a new subscription option in the EU, EEA and Switzerland. In November, we will be offering people who use Facebook or Instagram and reside in these regions the choice to continue using these personalized services for free with ads, or subscribe to stop seeing ads. While people are subscribed, their information will not be used for ads.” The subscription has been introduced to address the concerns of the European Union about Meta’s ad targeting and data collection practices. Meta believes the new policy will have a more clear and definitive privacy requirement met. The requirements are set by the European data laws that include the Digital Markets Act and GDPR. Free access that comes with ads is set to remain available. “If you choose to continue to use our products for free, your experience will stay the same – and that experience will continue to be supported by the tools and settings that we have created to empower people to control their ads experience,” Meta explained. Meta has written in their blog post while announcing the subscription, “We respect the spirit and purpose of these evolving European regulations, and are committed to complying with them.” The ad-free subscription will be available only for those 18 and above in the EU, EEA, and Switzerland. It will initially apply across all linked Facebook and Instagram accounts. Eventually, however, Meta will be charging extra for linked accounts. Starting March 1st, 2024, there will be an additional fee of €6 on the web or €8 on iOS and Android per linked account. The company told The Wall Street Journal that it will temporarily stop showing ads to teenagers in the region from November 6. Read Also: Whatsapp Drops Support For Android KitKat: Latest Updates Manish Rawat’s Zinmatt Is Making Learning Free And Accessible Youtube’s Ad Sales For Q3 Fy23 Surged By 12.5%, Reaching Nearly $8 Billion

Its A Clash For Dr Disrespect And Ninja Over Multi-Streaming: Report

Tyler "Ninja" and Herschel "Dr DisRespect" have had a clash on social media over multi-streaming. Dr DisRespect appeared to be insulting those who multi-stream on different platforms in a tweet. For those who don't know, Tyler is one of the most popular creators who actively simulcast on various websites like Twitch, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter. Dr DisRespect is known for his boisterous antics on the stream, and his social media posts reflect his on-stream personality. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, he seemed to be calling out creators who simulcast on multiple platforms, suggesting that those who multi-stream do it because they are not good enough for one platform. "If you have to multi stream, that’s because you’re not good enough for one platform,” tweeted Dr DisRespect on X. This happened to have worked, and Tyler came up with a reply, wasting no time. It was clear to the community that Dr DisRespect's post was aimed at Ninja. SypherPK, another streamer who multi-streams, tried to spark a playful exchange between the two creators by tagging Ninja in a reply. Ninja was one of the leading creators who openly multi-streamed. He ended his partnership with Twitch in September last year to stream on other platforms such as YouTube and Kick. Additionally, the renowned Fortnite star was one of the most vocal critics of Twitch when they introduced policies that prevented streamers from simulcasting. After the Twitch CEO's announcement at TwitchCon that the multi-streaming policy would be reversed, Tyler returned to his old platform as a partner. Given his public support for multi-streaming in recent months, it was inevitable that Dr DisRespect's comments would provoke a response. Read Also: HBO Max Decides To Take Away 4K From Ad-Free Subscription Plans Elon Musk To Introduce New Products That Will Challenge YouTube And LinkedIn

Instagram Head Adam Mosseri Says, “Threads Is Not Going To Amplify News”

New Instagram app ‘threads’ are not prepared to challenge Elon Musk’s X if statements made by Adam Mosseri recently hold. Instagram head Adam further stated that the company didn’t intend to ‘amplify’ news on this platform. Users can also delete the Instagram account if they don't prefer the "Threads" concept. Although his position is not that unsure, it is discourteous if someone is looking to exit X in favor of benefits. https://twitter.com/safespace4space/status/1712165140127179201?s=20 As per Meta’s information, social media platforms, like Facebook and Instagram, have had difficult relationships with news publishers over a few years. They have even had fights regarding publishing fake news, accusations, and clickbait of multiple political biases. Meta-owned ‘X’ social media platform has the potential to pull X users who are unsatisfied with Musk’s changes. At an Instagram creator event held last week, Mosseri expressed his statement, “We want to empower creators in general. We try not to slant too hard into the news. We’re not anti-news.” https://twitter.com/ians_india/status/1712348108120604902?s=20 While it is reasonable to say that Threads might be too new to have this solid approach to handling modern news. The requirement for X alternatives has become more popular in increasing the number of misinformation. Regarding additions, Mosseri is incorrect that Threads is not getting any news. Recently, the company has deleted many news-related search terms, such as ‘covid,’' the Washington Post,’ and so many others. Keep Reading: YouTube Ends Premium Lite Plans After 2 Year Trial Period! Get Your Deets AI Coaching Comes To LinkedIn Learning: AI-Powered Innovations To Revolutionize

7 Shocking Causes of Fake Health News & Their Consequences

The Causes

The Consequences

The Cure