Which Nations Have the Greatest Disconnect Between Their People

Published on: 02 April 2019 Last Updated on: 12 September 2024
Greatest Disconnect

New research into the base pay of world leaders, including chancellors, prime ministers, and presidents, have found that some in OECD nations are earning as much as ten times the average wage of their respective citizens. Fresh data from IG Group has revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump earns $400,000 per year, six times the amount of the average American citizen. It’s important to note for the purposes of this report that IG Group uses the term base pay as a term for each individual’s basic salary or other forms of publicly funded compensation for their job role.

The data on President Trump might raise a few eyebrows when you consider that he famously committed to not drawing a salary should he be elected in the 2016 US presidential vote. President Trump has come under fire in recent months for his obstinate approach towards America’s ongoing trade war with China and the ensuing technological “Cold War”, which has seen America tighten its grip on US innovations. Despite earning six times the average American, Trump’s trade war has seen the States lose billions of dollars as a result. While this volatility has had a negative effect on the US, many investors see it as a good response to those who ask why trade forex? There have been plentiful opportunities to profit on moves by buying and selling the US dollar against the pound and euro in recent months.

New research into the base pay of world leaders, including chancellors, prime ministers, and presidents, have found that some in OECD nations are earning as much as ten times the average wage of their respective citizens. Fresh data from IG Group has revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump earns $400,000 per year, six times the amount of the average American citizen. It’s important to note for the purposes of this report that IG Group uses the term base pay as a term for each individual’s basic salary or other forms of publicly funded compensation for their job role.

While some people would accept that their nation’s leader would earn significantly more, it does highlight the disparity between the wages of presidents, prime ministers, and chancellors in some countries where wages are severely constrained. For example, although Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto ranked just 21st in the world out of all global leaders’ earnings ($166,797), this equates to ten times the average annual per capita GDP of Mexican citizens.

OECD nations

Source: IG

You might be surprised to find that it is the Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull who is the highest-earning head of government out of all the OECD nations. This also means that Mr. Turnbull earns ten times as much as the average Australian citizen, who takes home just $49,126 per annum, according to OECD data.

The data also takes into consideration the annual earnings of national royalty, such as kings, queens, and emperors across the globe. In the Netherlands, King Willem-Alexander, who assumed the Dutch throne in 2013, earns a shade under 24 times the average Dutch wage of $52,877. Emperor Akihito of Japan earns more than $3 million a year, which is an eye-watering 79 times greater than the average wage of a Japanese citizen.

The disconnect gets even greater, however. In Belgium, King Philippe rakes in $14 million, some 346 times the average Belgian wage of $49,675. Even at the tender age of 92, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth remains in a league of her own – raking in $107 million per annum, an astonishing 2,660 times the average British wage. Interestingly, if the Queen’s annual salary was to be shared equally across the United Kingdom population, each citizen would receive a mere $1.62.Read Also:

Content Rally wrapped around an online publication where you can publish your own intellectuals. It is a publishing platform designed to make great stories by content creators. This is your era, your place to be online. So come forward share your views, thoughts and ideas via Content Rally.

View all posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing

Apple Settles Lawsuit for $25 Million Over Family Sharing Feature Misrepresentation

In a recent development, tech giant Apple has agreed to pay a substantial $25 million to settle a 2019 class-action lawsuit, accusing the company of misrepresenting its Family Sharing feature. Despite Apple denying any wrongdoing, the settlement addresses allegations that the company falsely portrayed the capability to share app subscriptions within family groups. Apple’s settlement case is making headlines following Facebook. The lawsuit contended that a significant portion of subscription-based apps, a growing segment on the Apple platform, couldn't be shared among designated family members, contrary to the representation made by Apple. Court documents revealed that these apps were exclusively available to individual users who downloaded and subscribed to them. The court documents emphasized, "The vast majority of subscription-based apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members." This revelation challenges Apple's previous assertion and sheds light on a potentially misleading practice. Furthermore, the documents highlighted that despite the awareness that subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, Apple continued advertising these apps' features. This advertising strategy may have led millions of consumers to download subscription-based apps, assuming they were shareable within family groups, only to discover otherwise after making payments. While settling the lawsuit, Apple maintains its denial of misrepresentation or wrongdoing. The $25 million settlement resolves the class-action suit, concluding the legal dispute over the Family Sharing feature. This development raises questions about the transparency of subscription-based apps on Apple's platform and the need for clearer communication between the tech giant and its users. As the landscape of app usage evolves, consumers may become more vigilant about the representations made by tech companies, ensuring that advertised features align with actual functionalities. This settlement serves as a reminder for consumers and tech companies to maintain transparency and accuracy in representing features and functionalities, fostering trust in the dynamic world of digital platforms. Read Also: Time Magazine Names Taylor Swift The 2023 Person Of The Year This Is Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording Selena Gomez Gets A Kiss From Bestie Taylor Swift In Latest Birthday Instagram Post

READ MOREDetails
Youtube's Ad Sales For Q3 Fy23 Surged By 12.5%

Youtube’s Ad Sales For Q3 Fy23 Surged By 12.5%, Reaching Nearly $8 Billion

All those pesky YouTube Ads are turning out to be a boon for YouTube. For the end of the quarter on September 30, 2023, tech giant Alphabet, the parent company of Google, reported a total ad revenue of $59.6 billion. The ad revenue touched $44 billion, which was brought in by Google’s search business, which marked a hike of 11.3 %. YouTube has generated $7.95 billion in ad revenue for Q3 2023. It has been a 12.5% increase from the previous year. The corporation has credited the positive outcome to brand and direct-response advertising. The total ad revenue for the company has grown by 9.5%. The ad revenue in the previous year had been a far lesser number- a mere 1.9% since 2021. At an investor call, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, reported that daily views for the short-form video platform have increased significantly. YouTube Shorts has increased in views to 70 billion per day. It was 50 billion earlier this year. He even added that the company is planning to introduce enhancements for Shorts, including AI-powered editing tools along with other features. In his statement, he said, “I’m pleased with our financial results and our product momentum this quarter, with AI-driven innovations across Search, YouTube, Cloud, our Pixel devices and more. We’re continuing to focus on making AI more helpful for everyone; there’s exciting progress and lots more to come." Google has registered a total profit of $19.7 billion for the third quarter of 2023. It marks a 46% increase from that of Q3 of 2022. The company’s total revenue has reached $76.7 billion (11%). Google’s cloud computing services, Google Cloud, have also seen an increase in profit margins due to increased business in AI training tools. It marked a growth of 22% year over year in revenue. Interestingly, Google Cloud’s performance in Q3 revenue of $8.41 billion fell short of investor expectations. It missed the planned  $8.64 billion. Alphabet is even facing an antitrust trial, where it has been alleged of monopolistic practices in search dominance. This has led to Alphabet’s shares declining over 6% in after-hours trading, despite YouTube’s otherwise strong performance. Read Also: Whatsapp Drops Support For Android KitKat: Latest Updates WhatsApp Is Testing Pinning Feature With Specific Timeframe Manish Rawat's Zinmatt Is Making Learning Free And Accessible

READ MOREDetails
HBO Max Decides To Take Away 4K From Ad-Free Subscription Plans

HBO Max Decides To Take Away 4K From Ad-Free Subscription Plans

In May, HBO Max underwent a transformation and became Max. At that time, Warner Bros. Discovery assured existing subscribers on the ad-free plan that they could enjoy certain perks, such as 4K streaming, for a minimum of six months without any additional charges. Now, as we approach that six-month mark, it's time for a change. Max is reaching out to its affected customers, notifying them that while their monthly subscription cost of $15.99 will remain unchanged, they will lose a couple of perks starting on or after 5 December 2023. Specifically, 4K (and HDR) streaming will no longer be available for legacy customers. They will be limited to HD quality, similar to new signups for Max's ad-free tier. To continue enjoying 4K playback, legacy subscribers can upgrade to the "ultimate" plan, which costs $19.99 per month. This will be done for users who use their plan on smartphones and on their smart televisions. Legacy ad-free subscribers also had an extra concurrent stream (for a total of three) compared to the standard two offered to new $15.99 plan subscribers. Unfortunately, this perk will also be discontinued starting with the December billing cycle. There is currently no clarification from Warner Bros. Discovery regarding whether any subset of customers can retain these benefits. It's worth noting that downloads remain unaffected by these changes. Both legacy and current ad-free customers can still save up to 30 titles on supported devices for offline viewing when they don't have an internet connection. For those looking for a more budget-friendly option, Max offers a "with ads" tier priced at $9.99. While this tier doesn't include offline downloads, it does allow for two simultaneous streams and offers HD picture quality. Additionally, Max recently introduced an optional sports add-on that is free until 29 February 2024 but will cost an additional $9.99 per month for customers who wish to continue using it. Read Also: Elon Musk To Introduce New Products That Will Challenge YouTube And LinkedIn YouTube Premium Introduces International Price Hikes After Cracking Down Ad Blockers

READ MOREDetails